I had the phone-call I was waiting for
today.
I was convinced it would be a 'punching
of the air' moment while while yelling 'YES!!'
It was not.
Nor was it negative either.
What it was, was completely confusing,
unnecessary and with a confused message that was claimed to attempt
to prevent confusion and false impression that added to the confusion
immeasurably and gave me the impression that the entire reason
for this blog would
now become horribly apparent?!
Oh
dear?
Imagine
what it was like for me and as my partner in crime expressed how
annoying it was for them I then had their mobile battery run out at
around 2.30pm for the umpteenth time in four years.
I
have come to the conclusion there is a massive scam going on in the
North of England, somewhere lol, where they sell phones with fecked
batteries?!
I
have never, and I do mean never, run
out of battery while chatting on the phone to someone and yet for
over four years now this one person has this happen regardless of the
number of phones they have had and as you can see early in thee day!
It
is 16.48, or 4.48pm, as I type this and the phone conversation ended
two hours ago or more.
I
have since rang again and it goes straight to the answer phone.
Someone thinks this is deliberate, one of the negatives that has
moments of positivity before retreating back to negativity again. But
it cannot be deliberate when they have text you and asked you to
ring!
As
you can now imagine there were some big plans and preparations going
on and I had to inform many I know that certain things are about to
happen.
As
I am surrounded by negative people regarding this area the last thing
I wanted was to make a load of statements of what was about to happen
and then it does not happen? I will end up with a period of the
jealous egotistical people running a rampage over this.
Only
that latter part will end up with them looking even more stupid than
they do now which will end up being my fault, just you wait and see?
LMAO!
I
do not want these people to do this, they will do this, I will end up
hinting about it several times and then they will get the arse when
they are wrong and it will be my fault despite my warnings.
Look at my fecking track record
for feck sake!!
Now here is where it will start to make sense, get confusing and then
start to make it look like I was correct all along.
Now I stated right here that there will be precedents set, did I not?
I also explained how this worked and involved the Supreme Court and
told my partner in crime that they cannot set the laws on this at the
Civil Court, Family Court, or High Court either.
Now what I managed to glean before yet another battery death occurred
was that the solicitor in all this gave a confusing message first and
then sounded like they was confused over something.
Here goes nothing …
The client was
asked to attend a meeting to discuss their … future
This would
no doubt be because of the clients age and the amount of money to be
awarded in damages and the money mad parent, who spent several days
spending £1.2 Million when their child, while in my home, posted a
false news article stating she had won £1.2 Million on the lottery!
This
falsification was an idea by my partner in crime that I was gleeful
over because it would show what would really happen in a couple of
years time when she did get a similar amount to that.
This is why I
remarked that if a figure of that amount was awarded it would seem
really bizarre due to the false front page newspaper article created.
The solicitor
stated, in the meeting that would need to be paid for, that she now
does not want to tell her client how much she gets in case …
She spends it all before
they get it
Spends the amount revealed
and the figure comes in lower
Does not get any money at
all
This last point
begs the question, well how will they get paid?
The first two
have become a real problem because for about a month several remarks
have been made, including the words “well that was pointless ….'
about how much money will be awarded. Telling a woman with three kids
you will never have to worry about money again for the rest of your
life.
Over then years
ago the director Michael Winner claimed you could not live without
worrying about money unless you had £30 Million in the bank! I did
not agree then and I do not agree with this now!
So now a period
of confusion and frustration along with some stress has been caused
by the solicitor.
I had imagined
being in their building with a very large bunch of flowers but for
the first time in three years I want to have a go at them!
This is a
classic example of how people in the UK simply do not understand many
things that are rife throughout the UK. You cannot say these things
to someone living below the breadline as depicted by many national
tabloids because it will cause undue stress.
Besides, I have
known from day one and they have forgotten who the architect is in
all this and the one they stated is a genius.
I even knew we
could be screwed over by the system.
I stated from
the outset of this blog that everyone I have dealt with thus far and
this is everyone and a great many people and organisations that they
are all greedy and corrupt. Lying greedy immoral people claiming to
be moral and a service to the people. They are not. But one industry,
or a part thereof, I do not know … COURTS AND JUDGES.
I stated
previously that this is like Rotherham Council only way bigger.
It was only
natural, and plainly obvious, that a group within the system, or
government, would want to hush this up when they found out about it.
This is
precisely why this blog was created!
I would wager a
great deal of money that the solicitor has not been told about this
blog nor asked if precedents needed to be set on this case. Two
things that would both force a revealing of the amount of damages and
not being messed about and assurances that it will not go wrong when
it looks like a cover up may take place.
Because is the
conversation I had that was cut short remember, the solicitor
suddenly sounded a little doubtful.
The solicitor
finally explained what I knew a few weeks back, that the court and
judge cannot rule on this case and it has to be referred elsewhere
but seemed confused as to where. Well it is the Supreme Court
obviously?
Except it is
not!
Manchester High
Court is where things are going to be decided. Except it cannot.
UNLESS …
A
representative, law maker, from the Supreme Court of the United
Kingdom travel to other courts around the UK and set the laws,
punishments and rulings while there?
Only I do not
know the answers to this and nor do I have the answers I thought I
was going to get from a meeting to talk about the future.
Meaning my own
preparations, which are damned difficult with my condition and
compounded by negative and egotistical people waiting to pounce,are
now on hold. Except I do not know how long for!
However, the
solicitor did state that “it is now at the end of the case”
meaning, or insinuating once again that much will happen and it is
imminent?
Well so you
would think!
Now then … back to reality and the present time of the day, which
is now 5.20pm, and as I stated the phone went dead and that was all I
found out.
The solicitor sounded like she might suddenly be doubtful of the
outcome when it comes to money and seems to point to the fact that
the case has now to be referred elsewhere?
But a solicitor would surely have known this? Surely they know that
in the event that there is no option of stare decisis for the
sitting judge that the fact that there is no precedent that
one would have to be made and likely a binding precedent?
That last term merely means that in cases such as this in future that
any sitting judge in any court must refer back to this case for
determination of punishments, fines and damages to be handed out.
Of course there is the case of Rotherham Council only this one
differs as it resulted in a couple of children arriving and involves
the Council along with the Police, the Criminal Prosecutions Service
and Cafcass. It also involves a cover up, false arrest, refused phone
call to solicitors and falsified health reports for children along
with a false passport being issued.
YES, exactly the day the passport office ground to a halt except you
the public were not given the true reason for this. The child was
on a plane to Iraq for God's sake!!
So yes, way, way bigger than the individual cases ongoing now for
Rotherham Council.
Now it could be that the solicitor is not confused at all and maybe
it is my partner in crime? Except that before I could determine this
their battery died at 2.30pm ish and I could not ascertain where the
confusion was. With the solicitor or their client?
If it is their client then I have already told them that their
judge cannot rule on this case just like I told them to inform them
of the blog's existence and to mention the word precedent.
My measure of control is still a little off at times and the things I
want to take place, so there is no confusion, do not and I end up
being told about all the wrong and irrelevant things they deem
important.
There is one individual in the case that my partner in crime focuses
on entirely. Their focus is all on this person, who does not work for
any of the four main bodies, and is only interested and has been all
along in them being ruled against. They remember every detail of what
was said about this person and that gets conveyed on every occasion.
Except that in this case it is not only a full gone conclusion and
was on the very first court date, which is hidden away in my archive
somewhere.
Not important, forget them you see as the villain and
concentrate on the services being accused!
The latter are the bits I am not being fed, the important bits, the
relevant bits and the main body of the court case that the amount of
damages will be decided upon. Not what your enemy is and what lies he
told!
This reminds me of my own court case about this very subject that I
now think is in the same building I appeared in? Except I remember it
being called the Liverpool High Court? Except now there is no mention
of this court and the only pictures I can find on the Internet lists
this as the Liverpool Crown Court?!
Might explain why the focus now shifts to Manchester High Court?
Maybe the High Court in Liverpool was closed down years ago?
So this … so-called meeting to discuss the future has left us
completely confused! Something neither of us really needed, has
screwed up my plans which would never have happened had the three
things I asked to be mentioned in the meeting all got mentioned.
Ask if
PRECEDENTS need to be set
Explain
about BLOG
WHEN it
will be JUDGED, or date for Manchester High Court session
So of course the stress comes in because confusion has been presented
which leads me to think that this case is about to be bulldozed by
the corrupt government?
Enter stage left, THIS BLOG!
I, of course, now
have to put my plans on hold and I keep thinking indefinitely which
was unnecessary and avoidable had they stated when the Manchester
High Court date was for. Also would have helped had it not been
implied several times for the last month that the case was over!
If the word
'PRECEDENT' has been mentioned it would have provoked the solicitor
into explain that which has thus far not been explained and adding to
the confusion. How long does it take to set a precedent?
I heard my phone
make a noise and I must check it, but I bet it is EFFING Facebook
that keeps sending my useless, pointless and quite unimportant
notifications I am going to rip the backsides out of when I have
finished with these bloody legal people that do not stop and think
for a moment!
LMAO!
I laugh but it is
bloody frustrating at times, it really is.
As of right now it
has been up in the air for the first time ever and I have no idea
when it will come back down to Earth!!
Even though that
could all be put to rest with a phone call to someone that never has
any power in their phone battery!
LOL!
This blog has many dozens of posts that will immediately expose any cover up by the courts or the government in this case to save paying damages or the embarrassment to have to go through when the British public find out.
Very easy to publish all the paperwork for this case on here!! Which I will!!
Oh dear!
Imagine the embarrassment alone of a solicitor's firm being paid a large amount of money in costs and the client getting nothing more than an apology?
Would be far more embarrassing than the Thomas Cook case whereby they were awarded six times more than those poor parents even though they were ruled to be negligent, I think it was, in another court.
Also remember when it comes to the fees to be paid ...
Crown Court
Civil and Family Court
Three Years
Three Separate Solicitors
These are only the things I know about!