If anything untoward
was going on regarding the legal case then those involved would have
to be complete idiots if they did not think I had several back up
plans, just in case.
I always have back up
plans and often my back up plans have themselves … back up plans.
Now I never heard any
more last night and was told there would be a phone call today, but
as the solicitors secretary phoned my 'partner in crime' around
9.30pm last night, God only knows when this will come?
I hope it does because for the last 20 years they put us both through was not enough a very
uncomfortable and very long weekend is about to hit and that is
provided they ring next Tuesday?
Also I have been giving
things more thought, due to the owner of the law firm being the exact
same man in the exact case from 20 years earlier involving the same
individual. Yeah I am still getting over that as is the person
directly involved in the case.
Oddly two people I
mentioned it too failed to bat so much of an eyelid over this. But
then if my suspicions on thought processes are correct, and they
normally are, this only lends towards proving my theory correct
anyway. Still. No matter.
I have given out some
instructions today to get the ball rolling on my back up plans.
The fact that they
forced a change in the legal case also means it opens up doors to
what I can say and what I can do. Never a good idea, that one.
Provided nothing goes
wrong then nothing will happen … but if it is to go wrong and when
it goes wrong then at least two
plans will be put into motion.
I
say two because … well there is another option I am betting will
come to present itself to us over the next week. Good God, to think I
was now convinced I would finally be able to make my travel plans
this coming week?! These people are infuriating and are now proving
my previous theories on them, long since posted on here, to be
correct. An example … or a clue …
I
am very interested in finding out about the money regarding the
entire case. You see there are five courts, I am now told over 30
court appearances in total, the law firm or its creditors and the
Supreme Court that need to be paid. So my question?
The
exact dates and amounts when each of these gets paid.
Then
compare them to what has happened to us.
If
there is a difference in either I am willing to bet here and now
which way it will lean in both regards. This leaning will
prove yet again the attitudes and slanted and twisted views of these
people. I will inevitably ask them why these discrepancies exist?
After
all the lives of two people have been destroyed by all this and they
were in the process of destroying the lives of children too. They are
there to uphold and represent the law which exists to make sure
things are both moral and fair.
In
the years of the every increasing attitudes of holier than
thou I believe this has become
lost. I also am angry that this does not even occur to these people
even when you point it out. Well either it does not occur, which
means they are the wrong people to work in and represent the law, or
they do not care. Hm. In which case the same thing applies as regards
being capable of representing the law.
This
also has another detrimental affect that I cannot help but wonder if
the actions of closing the law firm down has something very big to do
with?
The
law firm also wanted to speak to me.
Oops!
Now
in the case that nothing is going on, no cover up is now in place and
things get transferred to another solicitor, in which case cheques
and paperwork get handed over by a new law firm to my 'partner in
crime' … they will not be familiar with the case and not even think
about speaking to me … possibly?
This
is what I am currently convinced of.
Unless
of course another route has been taken and there is always other
routes on offer to reach the same destination. At least one but the
possibility of a second one is the one, one would hope for.
So
today I am about on my bike to get some much needed exercise in and
wondering along with waiting about the phone-call that should come
today. With any luck.
Even
my 'partner in crime' told me they had wondered whether or not this
was some sort of cover up that I was worried about and could not
believe the timing of this occuring. Though a lot earlier could have
been disastrous.
It
will also be interesting to see that if they mention the fact to the
law firms ex staff that I not only know the owner of the firm but he
was directly involved, via me directly last time around, twenty years
ago when this all went wrong the first time around?
Of
course it could also turn out that he recognised both our names and
this is why they offered to take the case on and pay all the legal
bills?
Or
it could have been that the case could have saved the law firm from
going under?
Or
the Supreme Court recognised his name from the very early files
within the local council files and discovered he had done something
wrong?
Or
he knew the firm was going under and fled with clients money and
sunning himself on a beach in Brazil?
As
you can see there are many possibilities and even the phone-call
today might not explain fully what has transpired. Hopefully it will
and the worst that will happen is an extension of a few days to
receiving the damages? Fingers crossed.
Or
this could end up being the one thing I feared? That despite hoping
everything goes according to plan and justice is finally done but
instead turns out that I had set off a number of things in motion
that will reveal that everything in the UK is corrupt along with the
legal and British Justice system right up to the very top of the
pack? This would of course turn out to be the biggest coup I
uncovered but which is the one thing I hoped and mentioned that I
would not uncover!
It
would also be the sixth time, I remembered one today regarding The
Accident Group, I was involved with a case that started off looking
fantastic but fell flat on its face. Over a twenty hear period too!
All
this remains to be seen and we are told we were to be informed today,
I presume that they are expecting to tell us which firm will now ask
us in for the final time to tell us the Supreme Court's decisions?
This is the part that is most bizarre in all this! One single and
final meeting telling us what the Supreme Court decided and the
Solicitors Regulatory Authority step in and close the practice down
with literally 8 days left in a case that has lasted 3 years or
more?!
What
are the chances?
This
happening on the exact same day that a Police Officer walks into a
friends store and knows both my name, face and the fact that I would
be there. Even today my two friends asked me if they asked my name or
just said my name. They asked … but asked me and no one else in the
store of which there were three other people.
This
is the thing I find highly suspicious. Cannot it be merely
coincidence that these two very bizarre things happen out of the blue
and on the exact same day?!
I
simply cannot remember the last time I posted about something as
bizarre as either of these two things. Well over a year I am sure of
it. So two on the exact same day? Bearing in mind it is the Police
Force that have also been found guilty on our court case along with a
local council. These public services have all been found guilty of
and reported on many a time to have been helping each other out. The
Police and organisations like the NHS and local councils and of
course the DWP are all in there too. The NHS help out the DWP and
local councils, what I refer to as the evil trinity, and when
anything goes wrong along come the Police to knowingly falsely accuse
members of the public who realise they are breaking the law and are
helped out. Of course NO Legal Aid helps loads with this too.
Summing
up?
No
legal rights for over half the populace at the very least and added
to this an massive abuse of human rights too!
I
cannot even tell many people I know of this yet because the
non-believers and those hugely envious/jealous will only say “Oh I
told you neither of you will get anything!” to which I will reply
“Oh you know how it all works and how the Solicitors Regulatory
Authority, The Law Society and the Supreme Court all works and you
KNEW the law firm would go bust, did fucking you!”
Of
course they would become hostile over this without even thinking that
first off that has not been said yet, secondly that this is true they
do not know how any of this works and thirdly … I am the only one
with EXPERIENCE in all this in a lot more ways than just working as a
PA to a solicitor!
No
they would not consider that they would be 'asking for it' nor how
annoying their comments would be. So I wont tell them.
Well
I did say I have no one anymore that I can confide in and talk to!
LOL!
Sod it ... they cannot and are not allowed to act as legal representatives any longer so I may as well mention the closure of the practice by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority, provide the webpage for it as it is in the public domain anyway and allow anyone who visits here to check the name on the SRA article about their decision and compare that to documents that have resided on here for many years I have kept since 1995.
The practice is, or at least
was, called 174 Law, terrible name I know, and the owner is listed as Mark Cottrill.
As I stated those that are more
inquisitive can search back in my archives and will find several documents under the law firm name of Bell, Lamb & Joynson and find documents signed by this solicitor.
Both my 'partner in crime' and I are both in shock at this link. For three years 174 Law was used and yet this name that links the two cases twenty years apart escaped my attention ... and that of the law firm.
The question is ...
did something get discovered by the Supreme Court, as those original case documents would be in the 1500 page council file, who spotted something and acted to close down the law firm?
Very,
very weird coincidence.
http://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/142811.article?decision-1
