THE PARTS THAT GET TRUMPED

Interesting reading, reports coming out of the USA of late.

I read an oversight news report by the BBC though I'm not sure I got it off it what the BBC had intended?

I might add that I've had my suspicions about the BBC fit a long time that they proved to my some years back, first hand. Unfortunately the incident also lead the the death of my father but that's a story I long since covered on here.

So it was a highlight of my life recently to see and hear that Donald Trump banned the BBC as he named them as one of the fake news outlets!

Was music to my ears to have someone that has the highest profile in the world actually naming one of my enemies and calling then out for what I have done for over a decade.

Yup, as previously stated my stories, claims and predictions can end to in the media from a few days after I punish them to many years after I call them out.

That's why, when I publish links to stories, I always place my ... view of the issues.

Donald Trump wanted to make some major cuts to areas of government. The State Department and more noteworthy, in this instance, the United States Agency of International Development.

What I have found highly amusing is that he had tried to carry what he promised to do, which is why everyone voted him in, in the first place, which is actually a fucking first for a politician. Both in America and here in the UK, where it is still yet to occur.

Except in this BBC report everyone is complaining about it. Riiiight ... so a politician attempts to do the things he promised prior to being elected, and remember he was elected based on what he said he would do, and everyone is complaining about it.

Let's analyse this for a moment. He we voted in by many, many people and even those that voted Democrat might have agreed with some things he wanted to do.

One of those things he spoke about was America sticking their noses into foreign affairs. Funnily enough I also remember this being complained about a lot when George W. Bush was president. It probably occurred previous to his presidency. It was also complained about when Barack Obama was president but they oddly omitted to name or blame President Obama. It is as if they didn't want to point the finger of blame on his direction? Maybe they didn't want to be labelled? Who knows?

But now President Trump had claimed he is going to cut the budget for USAID and everyone is complaining about it? Weird.

The funny thing is, I saw this promise of pulling out of foreign affairs to be very un-Republican to be honest. After all the last Republican government were the worst offenders of sticking their noses in. Weapons of Mass Destruction and all that.

What is absolutely ludicrous is that the media had latched onto this like a dug-in Tick? Well no, they were the largest whiners about American foreign policy?!

Oooh waaait? I said this approach was very much against the grain for Republicans? They have all been complaining and running down President Trump too?

Soooo those that have hated Trump because he made them all look like idiots when they smeared him at every chance, scoffed at the idea of him becoming president. These now have the chance to attack Trump in news reports to get back at him for calling them out for their bullshit and fake news and contradict their own bullshit to jump on the bandwagon at every single opportunity?

Hmm ... that paragraph kind of got away from me.

I think it has been hilarious at how much the fake news media have made themselves so obvious in their intentions. They have been so obviously contradictory in their desperation.

Also at the same time I believe Donald Trump has done wonders for himself with voters by acting on his promises.

This goes double for the decision to make major budget cuts to two major organisations.

Maybe the two successive governments in the UK (or is it three now?) could take notes from his actions?

He has been sincere as well as deciding on some big money savings by cutting public services instead of ... ooh let's say sticking the knife into disabled people, both physical and mental health sides. Despite what they said recently!

Oh that reminds me, it did not escape my notice of a report of a Tory member of government stating that Personal Independent Payments should be for real disabled people and not those sitting at home taking pills for anxiety. Nice.

The mental health groups have reacted to this. Fuck me someone had actually done something?! I bet it's not much other than whining?

It's also fucking hilariously insulting as they are not and have not paid it to those that do have painful conditions and in the case of Fibromyalgia, likely other conditions too, a condition that causes not only a list of pains around your body, screws with your skin and memory but also causes anxiety attacks so bad your legs can switch off to your brain, known as rubber legs.

Umm ... hold on? He told the media they disability benefits should go to those with physical pain? Except they're not don't that and not even to patients that have lists in not just one camp but both camps?!

Oh and the media covered this? Wow, funny how they have ignored to call him out on his amoral bullshit by producing a short list of case studies that show him, or her, as a liar?!

Why it's almost as if the TV News Media and ask the national tabloids don't want to print or report on any of these factual and inexcusable cases?

I wonder why?

I not only know of one of the worst, if not the worst, cases but have reported on it.

Oddly enough the Pro Bono Publico Solicitors now are refusing to go any further than a Mickey Mouse court, or Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunal Service who don't even have proper courts and I know refusing to consider human rights in their decisions.

But wait a moment 'Pro Bono Publico' means 'for the public good' which strongly insinuates cases on human rights and without precedent? It could not mean anything else. But they would mean a case that would have to be decided upon by the Supreme Court. They state the next stage of the Court of Appeal? But then therefore means you would have to go through that to get to High Court before the Supreme Court would even be requested to decide on new laws and punishment for cases involving breaches of someone's human rights that have no precedent. Exactly what 'Pro Bono Publico' implies. But they have refused to go on after falling at the first hurdle? Despite being full on confidence they would win this case!

No human rights anymore as the British government is proving to the whole nation what everybody basically knew or suspected for the longest time ... that money is far more important than human life.

I bet many jailed people who murdered people while stealing from them think they are the biggest hypocrites going?

Defraud the public when your small time and your sent to prison. Do it when your a multi million dollar company and this is fully acceptable behaviour?

Double standards, much?

Wrong message, much?

But in America we have our first leader to carry out, well three things thus far, or tried to carry out the things he promised.

Only he has been thwarted on one several times and three quarters of the American public that wanted this have been told, 'sorry, democracy is actually a scam. How dare to most of you that wanted this, we say we know what's better for you even on this occasions where it's not only obviously not better for you but even when experts and sensibly sane people prove it we will still say no?'

Yeeeah ... that's not going to piss off and alienate a large majority of your public. No of course not, why would anybody that wanted this, overjoyed when acts were made to get what they were promised only to have patronising people with God complexes tell you sorry but you don't know what you really want, only we do.

You'd think that the simple fact of Donald Trump winning and everyone now calling out all the major news networks as reporting fake, well bullshit, news, that they would have learned their lesson? But, no.

I ask myself if it's got to the point where those in power don't even care that their falsification attempts are now widely known?

Maybe they now have adopted the attitude that they don't care if we are all are now as there is nothing that we can out would do against them?

Or maybe it's like what I've said all along? But now I would state it thus; that they have managed to get their own web pages and that this makes them professionals when it comes to the Internet? No, Mr Murdoch, just no! It does not!

Or in other words maybe they simply have no idea that on liberal run sites, or at least they think they are liberal lefties, like Twitter, Facebook and YouTube that even in those places everyone is going nuts and calling the mainstream media 'fake news'?

Yeah I have actually seen people try to claim the fake news accusations of the major news networks bullshit but ...

I'm afraid every argument I've seen out forward as has so...Idiotic it's just not true. Plus ... well you would have to be a complete moron to argue it's bollocks when guests have actually sat in CNN's studio and called them the "Clinton News Network" to their faces! Especially when they even apologised for one they got caught out on. Claiming they didn't hear everything when they are standing right there ... just simply won't wash either.

So his travel been has been thwarted thus far. His wall of getting opposition and she is his idea of state and foreign policy cuts?

That's not only most of what he promised he was voted on for but I've even listened to Americans who voted for Hillary Clinton also agreeing with one or more of his promises. So that's a hell of a lot more than half the populace.

Well it's a bit like here then? The bit I worried about with Brexit? That the government will totally ignore what the public wants to do to help the country and save money? No they will do this either completely the opposite or not even they close?

Like hearing or people being deported or told they will have to leave in ever growing numbers except those at the very top of the list, or only one on said list, everyone wants gone. Instead picking on the weak and vulnerable they know cannot fight back? Namely disabled people, people with mental health problems and likely soon, if not already, those with learning difficulties?

Yeah, why would anyone in their right mind cut out close down public services that do little or nothing for the public good and deport rust that do not deserve to be here?

Utterly preposterous!

Poppycock!!

The one and only thing that has concerned me about Donald Trump is the talk of cuts to scientific research. I cannot state that I have heard everything he has said, far from it, but the cuts to science are my only concern thus far and I have never even been to America, mores the pity.

I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it: Top Republican says Trump's budget plan 'dead on arrival' - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39123281

THE STARK REALISATIONS

I am still watching the odd video, American based, on Donald Trump's presidential win and a very interesting reaction to some news reports.

To my surprise I spotted an video that had a title stating a moment when MSNBC News stated that they realised that the news media played a part in Donald Trump winning.

They speak about how the New York Times were partly responsible along with many others for not concentrating on the people of America. They then point out the titles to the reports in the New York Times that still ignores what the people wanted and instead concentrates on the gloomy side of the outcome.

The guy on MSNBC,, I can only see his first name of Joe, speaks about his greatest respect for the New York Times but points out a great many failings in modern journalism.

It was quite interesting to watch because there were four people in the studio and they all looked stunned and that is putting it mildly.

One other person in the studio also mirrored what Joe was saying and also held up the issue of The New York Times to point out its heading and sub-heading.

Now for me … what Joe said was … ballsy and I have a lot of respect for him to point out what he did.

Though it did sound like that The New York Times were telling people that Hillary Clinton has a 98 to 99 percent chance of winning, insinuating that a large number did not bother to vote as Hillary Clinton had it in the bag.

Joe also pointed out that one news reporter was 'slammed' for stating that Hillary Clinton only had a 70% chance of winning.

He also gave a message to the New York Times and stated that anyone voting for Donald Trump was a racist and a bigot and went on to say that if they continue to believe that 50 million Americans were racist and bigots then he pitied them.

In other words change your tune before you commit commercial suicide.

This is why the tabloids in America and the UK are failing, it is not because of the Internet for any other reason than the real facts that are unbiased can be FOUND on the Internet. Yes you have to have a feel or a bit of know-how to sort out the wheat from the chaff and there are times when that can be hard. But the more you look around the more you can build up a picture.

In other words you are doing the job that journalists are paid to do but either do not bother and put their own political desires over or fulfilling that of someone else's.

The video below is that which I am talking about but I would wager that both on and off screen there are a lot of stern talks going on like that. Because some that DO consider themselves as professionals have ended up looking bad.

He openly admits that Michael Moore he does not see eye to eye with but Michael Moore stated that Donald Trump would win because Americans are hurting and he praised Michael Moore for getting it right.

That takes a lot of balls to do what Joe did at MSNBC and I for one am both surprised and impressed at his little speech.

I do wonder what more can come out of all this in the media.

I heard a couple of reporters from two national UK tabloids react with a 'no' when asked if they thought Donald Trump would employ Nigel Farage, as he had just been there, as ambassador to the UK. Now this was not your average negative 'no' but an almost dismissive sarcastic one where a man they dislike could not possibly be accepted.

Hmm now where have we experienced this news media negativity towards a single man in very recent times? Oh yeah, all the news media and in the UK too towards Donald Trump. Now they see how that worked out for them. O at least they should, if they take off their Ray-Ban sunglasses that is?

Hey guess what UK journalist numb-nuts? If Donald Trump gave him that position you would have no fucking choice, despite the fact that you think you and the British government do. Or are you simply going to ignore the Brexit voters yet again?

Jesus Christ the arrogance of UK national tabloid journalists is simply staggering, as is the level of blindness and deafness they are afflicted by. Take a look at the American news media as they are all back-peddling like crazy and eating humble pie. Jerk-offs.

At least the American media have actually realised what they have done. It was a mirror image of what was done to Nigel Farage by the news media and he still got votes, just did not do as well as Donald Trump.

Also you MIGHT want to take note of this … I told one Conservative voter and three Labour voters that the word on the wire was that Donald Trump was being offered the job of Ambassador to Europe and do you know what these people did? They burst out laughing! They thought that was hilarious due to feelings that both Nigel Farage and European leaders and diplomats have for each other.

I think you will find that everyone that voted for Brexit will also burst out laughing if this did indeed turn out to be true and he did become Ambassador to Europe.

The funny thins is that I knew nothing about Donald Trump, was not sure about him being president, but preferred him over Hillary Clinton, thought he was a a bit silly saying some of the things he did but find him interesting and likeable. I also admired Nigel Farage for having the balls to say many of the things he did and the criticism he took for it. So I find it not only quite surprising that Nigel Farage and Donald Trump are friends but also kind of neat as well as kind of interesting.

That last point? Yup, interesting because I am wondering if there is a game plan and wondering if I have already realised what that game plan is.

If I am right the UK and Europe are in for a big shock in either four years time or seven to eight years time.

Just saying and I said it here! Lol.

The world is a stage and you do not get much bigger than being one of the US Presidents right hand men. That tends to … change people's perspectives over time. A perspective that I thought had changed prior to the last general election in the UK. This was one of the few times I got it wrong, despite many being shocked at how many votes Nigel Farage and UKIP received.

I think Mr Farage has found a different route to the one he wanted which may turn out to be a lot quicker than his previous one? A much smarter one?

Just saying.

EDIT:

I stand corrected as it seems that people are both realising that the British News Media is crap and lying and manipulating the British people but is bein reported on, on YouTube just like the American media was ...

The BBC .. my favourite organisation followed by several other nationwide electrical store chains ...

The BBC .. my favourite organisation followed by several other nationwide electrical store chains ... sick and tired of celebrities that do not have to lie among it all and nor do they have to travel in buses and trains on inner London that get targeted by suicide bombers! ..

TERMS OF ENTITLEMENTS

People are strange, sorry Jim.

Even those you know can say the funniest things and show that they have never quite listened to you at all for many years.

Sometimes you can just say something and it triggers them off and then you hear al the stuff that makes you realise some cold hard truths.

As I have stated a few times I have been having it hard lately and harder than any time in the last 15 years. It is why I have had breakdowns and why I am on a certain pill called Proprananlol. It works unless the anxiety happens to be very bad then it seems to stop working. In fact on the odd occasions I have had anxiety lately I have realised I forgot to take my pills. One day when it was particular stronger than any other time I realised I had not taken my pills for two days.

Now usually I would be reminded I have not taken my pills as I would get sever heartburn at some point. But I have lost a shed load of weight and when that happens the heartburn becomes less of a problem.

Unless I eat baked beans.

This has always been that way.

So it gets mentioned a hell of a lot whenever I am speaking to people I know about my different … afflictions.

So imagine a scenario whereby you mentioned that the difference in money is that even though I am surviving on crab paste on toast I am still running out of money. Then imagine that they then turn around and state, forr the umpteenth time so I REMEMBER what others say, “Oh told you before, don't go to Sainsburys, go to Lidl's and spend £30 on beans that will last you a month”. This is where I tell people that I am different whee I could then state “AND I TOLD you before that I cannot eat beans!” and then imagine that despite being reminded of this several times and explaining that I DO love beans one replies “Well, that's down to you then!”

Yes I explained yet again that I get severe heartburn when I eat beans and I guarantee that of the same conversation took place in a years time they will tell me to go down and spend £30 on baked beans at Lidl's as they have said it for the last 4 years or more.

Did you miss the main points in all that?

• I am not eating because I have no appetite
• I said I lived on Crab Paste (70 pence and lasts 3 days) and bread

I hope I did not have to put down how much bread costs as it is a staple food source and has been for thousands of years? Good.

I also mentioned that I was going to see someone this week that will help me with my major problem that I have with the DWP, in that I feel like they are going to try and kill me and will get worse at some point.

When I mentioned this I was asked, why?! So I told them that these were disability specialists and legal and I was asked “Well what IF they say your not disabled?” and that was really “Well I don't think your disabled!” This was someone I fell out with for a couple years as they had adopted that attitude previously. When we started talking again they were sorry about it. Except we seem to be right back to where we was previously?

I was then asked “WHO is paying for this?” and the penny dropped.

That was really 'Is that coming out of my taxes?' when the truth is they do not make enough money to pay any.

I was shockingly told recently that the government should not pay disabled and old people so that they could die and take the stress off the country?!

I know, right?

Yeah they did not do the math for a start … once you get over the shock of what was said.

They never stated anything like this previously and I realised something about them and a lot of other people in the UK. Things have been bad for so very long that more and more people are becoming amoral. Despite the fact that I keep telling them they should choose their targets carefully and not throw stones at everyone. For starters you cannot win that way. Nor can being so angry that you talk about exterminating or removing people.

What I want to say in situations like this is that if you was a politician and you come out with stuff like that you would have to be an idiot. You would not last as a politician for very long but sometimes when I hear different people talk it sounds like that they genuinely want that?!

Though I complained about the extreme left Social Justice Warriors wanting unattainable things some people on the right, many of which jumped from centre-left to far right, harp on about wanting things that are not attainable.

It is like a form of entitlement based on delusional things? They think that by exterminating or letting disabled people die and not having a welfare state is going to make things right where their income is overnight? My friends it wont do this in five years time nor ten years time.

Note that one of the biggest problems during the recession is people not spending money, while rent, rates and buildings costs spent the previous years going through the roof and into outer space! Something should I have been done long ago, long ago I told everyone something should have been done, nothing was done and now were in the mess I predicted 4.5 years before it struck.

But now I a paying for it?! Right. Never voted for any of the twats ,until Nigel Farage came along that is.

I would rather vote for someone that speaks his mind than have all the stuff said to me that I want to hear only for it never to happen.

President Barack Obama promised three things and since in power everyone thinks he was the greatest thing since sliced bread was invented.

• Guantanamo Bay closed … didn't happen
• Troops brought back from middle-east … didn't happen
• Gun Laws changed … didn't happen
• Healthcare, I refuse to call it ObamaCare … kinda sort of happened … after a long pause

OK so I remembered one he sort of brought in and added it. Credit where credit is due.

Oh … could not remember thellast one so I Google'd 'Obama broken promises' and I found a page that lists quite a few. Now you have to remember if you go and look at this that this could be a page very biased in the favour of the Republicans, yeah they get up to some similar shit, so might want to take that into account. There are six pages and it could be as many as 120 broken promises?

But then President George W. Bush might have broken 200 and you might not read about it on the web-page below.

I always try to get a 'feeel' for bias. Normally I can pick it up after reading for a bit or even just listening for a few minutes. IF … I am interested enough to read or listen to it all, that is.

Anyway … three major broken promises.

I didn't care about any of the three broken promises, I did about health care and I am not American nor have ever been there.

But this is after eight years!

Your only allowed to be President for 8 years!

Every single President they vote for from now on has an excuse not to do a damn thing they promised to. “Well Obama didn't fulfil his promises” will echo in the ears of every journalist for the next twenty years or more.

Everyone though things will be way better when Obama was president. Did not happen. Everyone thinks, or a quarter to a half do, that President Trump will bring hell on Earth?! Mark my words it will not happen. I know many kinda want it to go this way, to prove a point on one side of the argument and get rid of a lot of problems and people on the other side of the argument.

WILL … NOT … HAPPEN.

Out there bustin' heads over it though!

The attitude is that if someone says a stupid thing enough or does a stupid thing enough things will go in their favour and eventually improve for them?!

NOT … GOING … TO … HAPPEN!

You could get part way their and that is by … wait for it … picking the targets one at a time, vital that, and STICKING to them and stop moaning about fucking everything and everyone.

There is an saying that has lasted through the ages … divide and conquer.

Probably not a good idea to battle or 'have it in' for groups of people your friends with or have a family member that belongs to any group. Yeah not a good idea that one.

I was hearing tales of people on Facebook blocking friends they have had for years because they voted for Donald Trump! I have to wonder if this also happened with Brexit?

Stupid … stupid … stupid.

Some of these people are worth millions of pounds/dollars! Really … I mean … REALLY?!

#Facepalm

I do worry and I see the signs that the things that annoy me with people I meet is now the attitude or becoming the attitude of the UK populace?

I just did a little chuckle … just then.

I suddenly wondered what people might try and guess about me if reading my posts and thinking about it, my political leanings that is.

I imagined someone thinking “Oh, bad person he is right wing … no wait a minute he is left wing?! No, no he is definitely left wing … no, right!”

Yeah … if you have … well … you would be spot on. I am neither, lol. If pushed and I have said this before I would be centre to left a bit … but will swing over to right-wing on certain subjects.

I said to someone today talking about Social justice Warriors … “The trouble is … extreme left wing … bonkers … extreme right wing … also bonkers” where the reply was “Extreme left is worse!” and I replied “Really? Because the way I see it they will kill you at either end of the spectrum. One for what colour you are and the other for what you say!” Lol!

What annoys me even more than the Social Justice Warriors are the complete boneheads that support and follow them...but I put this down to men that get a kick out of being opressed by women and turned on by those take charge type women.

Tip … the Social Justice Warrior women are not your only option, they do not have to me bat-shit crazy to be take charge kind of women. Lol. You just follow them because they stick out like a sore thumb, especially on YouTube!

But hey, whatever your into is you business and makes no nevermind to me. Just do not be surprised if you stick your head out in a very public way on social media and you get it chewed off.

Now for the surprising shit about me compared to the Social Justice Warrior types …

• I never stand around telling sexual jokes
• I do not stand around with people talking about sex all the time
• I have been single for 12 years plus
• I do not approach every woman IU find attractive to ask them out
• I have never expected any of my ex's to do certain … chores, like cook for instance
• I will say hello or be courteous and thank anyone for good manners no matter WHO it is

I wonder how many Social justice Warriors have just read several posts about themselves, got a picture in their head about me and now confused and thinking “Oh I got him wrong!”

Do not feel alone … a lot of people do and even those a lot closer to home! Lol.

I just get annoyed at seeing people argue or spend money, time and hours campaigning for things they will never achieve instead of concentrating the things that you CAN achieve.

There are a lot of things wrong in the western world, governments and societies and it is not some imaginary beast of a being you think up that represents some evil system.

There are people really suffering in the world and dying too.

If you have an individual that genuinely does have a problem with you and what you are make sure that you are right and that when you do reach that point just think “Fuck 'em. They are not worth it” because despite everything I say I do not like prejudices … unless they are truly deserving of it. One two faced lying lot spring to mind.

As I said to someone today it is all about progress and progress takes time and cannot be forced and if you DO try and force it then things may well get worse for you. Fulfilling your own prophecy you thought you were working so hard to prevent.

As for the terms for all the different trans-gender types? Really? Someone was on TV in America arguing about this being made law?! REALLY?! There looked like a long list of pronouns and … my God … you really expect people to know which one to use by simply LOOKING at someone?! Did you actually plan out a guide leaflet for every American citizen to carry around do every time they meet someone they can pull it out and check? Have you ANY idea of how many people across America will get seriously offended as the emerging leaflet will basically tell them that the person wielding it does not know what gender they are?!!

Well .. some will be wise enough NOT to pull out a gender guide in front of people but many probably will.

Do these people EER think things through? Do they not think of possible scenarios for the things they want implemented? Every time I hear one speak or make demands I immediately think, 'nope … NOT thought that one through!'

But then as I always discover more and more of late people not only fail to think things through or do their research they also either have short memories or have changed their minds yet again over something.

My word … it is almost like we live in a world whereby people cannot stop to think for five minutes?

Could you imagine what a world we be like to live in if it was like that?

Oh, wait?!