THE AGE OF AQUARIUS BRINGS ICE

Well it has been awhile since I posted and I apologise for that.

There have been good reasons and it has been for good causes. You see I have been battling on social media on very large threads regarding climate change. You are going to get a very interesting incite into what has gone on. There will be another part regarding these AGW pushers that will include the laughs and the battles along with the incompetence.

In these battles are a large many scientists on both sides but I will tell you now that a great many on my side as well as friends I know do not believe 90% of them that claim to be scientists are what they claim. The answers, or lack thereof, to questions put to them have ranged fro ludicrous to laughable as is their methodology for ruling out opposing arguments.

Trust me when I state that I exposed a large portion of them.

To give you an idea of the size of the thread .. bear in mind there are more on the sceptic side of AGW than on the pseudoscientific pushing side.

I have been blocked more than 30 times and muted at least 7 .. and they love to rant when someone mutes or blocks them and call them cowards and claim victory. Of course they have long lists of excuses for their blocks. More snowflakey then twitter themselves!

Also remember that I had previously been blocked by Professor Brian Cox over climate change along with a few others not in that list of blocks and mutes. While during getting myself blocks in these, two I believe, threads of 50 people .. I also got blocked by Michael Mann!

I destroyed a Michael Mann paper that was amateurish and contained erroneous data, primarily of the Dust Veil Index (or DVI), which if I recall correctly he tried to argue that the Little Ice Age was localized. Oh boy did the word 'localized' come up a lot with these cult members.

Show them entire countries of record cold? Localized. Show them entire continent? Localized. Stitched Europe, Australia (yes record cold), Canada, US and South America together into the same image and then throw in record cold in Russia in July this year? Effing LOCALIZED?!

Now this is their argument .. as these many, many countries are all localized they do not affect the global average temperature. Kid you not and will get into this with details in another piece. I even threw in several temperature maps of North Africa being below average, made zero difference. Quite where they are getting the warm constantly rising temps from is beyond me.

They also argued that it had gotten consistently warmer the last three to four years and that 2019 would be the hottest on record, I kid you not. To prove this they post a climate models prediction map but they fail to notice has the real temps on it. They also fail to notice that it clearly shows a little after the last solar maximum of 2014 the global averages head down for two or three years. This also does not include 2018 and 2019. Winters that have gotten both colder and longer.

If you do not know the models have been failing since 2014 and soon there will be daylight between the lowest of the 100 plus to 200 plus predictive models and the real world. This will happen during 2020.

They had to eventually admit that using the term 'localized' was wrong. There is a whole list of words 'trend' being another, they claimed meant something different to what it actually does. Lost count of the number of times I had to show screenshots because they ignored a pasted quote and link to Dictionaries, Collins English and Cambridge, showing the true meanings of words they tried to twist. Lost … count!

Now the names of note ..

• Ned Nikolov PhD
• Patrick Moore (co-founder of Greenpeace)
• Dennis Jerz (was hilarious)
• Dr Paul Williams (British failed climate modeller and AGW pusher)
• Tony Heller

I did argue on one of these thread previously and I might have even mentioned it on here? But I found myself back with some familiar names .. names that lie through their teeth.

For example one man kept hijacking my threads to state I was talking garbage with links and I kept countering. He would go away and then come back later on another thread and this went on and on.

His profile stated that we were entering a 'No Ice Ice-Age' which is utterly stupid. He later stated that there was no Grand Solar Minimum happening now but there will be one in 2060?! I have asked him for many months and still do about his calculations to reach this claim but he has never answered despite asking more than 50 times. They all come out with wild claims like this with nothing to back them up. You state anything they want papers and blood signed documents and anything you provide them is dismissed as rubbish in two minutes.

Putting this to the test I once posted more than 15 scientific papers looking at volcanoes, solar activity and others .. all at once. Peer-reviewed, as they demand, too. I had done this a number of times before I pointed out to my side that they had dismissed these scientific papers as rubbish within 5 minutes. Informing them they had not read them they claimed I was lying and that they had to which I said ..

“Oh? You managed to read and work out the calculations and theories in more than 15 scientific papers in less than 5 minutes?!” This was from someone claiming to be a Marine Biologist who did not know why Flamingos were pink and claiming to be an expert on climate. He had clearly lied. He also says he is not a Marxist but has a library of books by Karl Marx. Lied again. Lies a lot and has been torn up over it.

My battles became famous as did my creation of images and memes to tear them all new ones.

Battling with me is not wise and many people caught on that I would leaver breadcrumbs, as I just explained one, and lure them into a trap. A few new people that would come in would try to explain but others would tell them to wait. Some contacted by direct messaging and say “No .. do not say anything. Just watch. He is leading them on .. and into a trap. He has done this hundred of times and its hilarious to watch!”

Had no end of direct messages myself .. ended up in a group with people telling me I was “hilarious to watch”, “knew what I was talking about”, “thanks for educating me” and things top each other like “I just love the way he tweaks them!”.

Even publicly people would say “you enrage them, they have never managed to beat you despite claiming they have and they have a meltdown because they cannot work you out!”

This is a thread of some very smart people and a load of others that either are scientists or claim to be but no one believes them.

Now all that and screen-shots of much of this .. a LOT of this is coming in another part. More to prove what I am saying here and for the laughs.

While at the same time those not sure about all this can see for themselves the sort of political leaning hard-left lying shits that are around and trying to convince them of something that is not real. I have no issues with listening to socialists, Marxists or the AGW people. But 90% of the time these people turn out to be lying bar stewards. They intentionally give out misleading information.

By the end of this post I will link a number of things together that proves what I previously claimed and I will prove beyond a doubt that AGW is both not real .. and the claims that it is 'proven' or 'settled' is a lie. The latter with a video from 2019 fro the European Parliament.

The sections will consist of a run over of my own theories on this very blog about the cooling and warming in Europe. I will go over solar cycles again just to refresh for those unfamiliar with this subject. We will take some trips to China and South America to do with cycles which backs up what I have stated and destroys a Michael Mann paper I had previously destroyed. Then we move onto another area I had predicted I have since found out has a name, Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events and how they work and what is happening right now. Then finally onto another bastion of the AGW cult and that is sea temperatures.

Just like I have linked many things previously I will be linking them all together again and clearly.

Then we will go into the areas of predictions that you likely have not been hearing about in the mainstream media but I can assure you of this .. by February or March 2020 they will not be able to avoid these stories without convincing the last few people that watch the news that they are being lied to.

The AGW and Marxists, Leftists and Extinction Rebellion members have a meltdown because now I know from what I have seen the last six months that the whole leftist push using global warming will be over in 6 months time.

I have to thank the many people that have provided me links, well except the lying AGW who provided me links and I went through them with a fine tooth comb. As on every single occasion I looked the links and papers, and even the graphs, did not state that which they claimed. Yeah these people are that bad and that determined to keep this lie alive. Because without it their leftist plans of a takeover of the western world is well and truly .. DEAD!

Not only will they look to be wrong and incompetent but they would mostly be revealed as absolute evil schemers and liars that have continued their tactics for a great many years.

EUROPE COOLING AND MY THEORIES

Now I would have explained on this blog about my trip to Calabria in southern Italy around the year 2000 or 2001. When I did I would have explained that I never bought into the whole CO” AGW story. At all. I was there for Salamandra salamandra gigliolii which is a very orange Fire Salamander atop a mountain. It is more orange, usually they are yellow with exceptions, and has more of the bright colour in relation to the black. Hundred miles or so away they are not the same despite being the same subspecies. There is also a toad, Bombina pachypus, that works the same way is related to Yellow Bellied Toads, like Oriental Fire Bellied Toads you see in stores, but is also orange. On another mountain top to the west is Ichthyosaura alpestris inexpectatus and its nearest other relative is Ichthyosaura alpestris apuanus around 800 miles north. The southern one is more drab, 2 inches longer or more and has different skin texture. These are called Alpine Newts.

Hey cannot survive at sea-level as it is too warm and yet somehow they got separated atop mountains at a few thousand feet. I asked AGW this conundrum and no one could answer it .. or they got it wrong.

At the end of the day they migrated there .. which means a very long time ago and talking thousands of years it was cooler in Italy. As it slowly warmed they went up the mountains to stay within their preferred microclimates. So it has not warmed since the Industrial Revolution as they claim it has.

While there I solved a puzzle many had wondered about as the Fire Salamander was the only one out of 36 plus types that was actually diurnal.

I realised that a mist blew up the coat and over the top of the western mountains and spent the day drifting across the valley. It would then collect and build up around the eastern mountains at night. When conditions were right and a wind blew down fro the north it would pass over the Alps cooling the air. This would hit the valley by the early hours causing precipitation and salamander love that. Ergo they became diurnal.

Upon my return to the UK many came hearing I had solved that puzzle and every single expert I spoke to said 'My God! That is IT!!'

Later on I will go into how two teams of scientists, since my discovery, realised the same thing occurred by studies in China.

Sure enough this occurs across the world and while this was known about birds even in Costa Rica none of the scientists or so-called animal experts thought of looking at the slow moving creatures, like slugs to amphibians, that cannot just get up and fly.

Since that day in 2000 I waited years for this to be realised and the whole CO2 argument to fizzle away and die. Instead no one did and the whole AGW thing just grew and grew, to my astonishment.

THE EARTH & SOLAR CYCLE CYCLES

Sooo solar cycles? Yes have headed down for three cycles at least, so 33 years, and the AGW know so much about what is going on they still quote the cycles as lasting 11 years. Yet I have posted graph after graph that had they bothered to read, I had to point it out much later, had extended to 13 years. This stared with what they call a deep solar minimum. In 2008 there were very few Sunspots, a guide to how active the Sun is. William Herschel first linked high Sunspots with low wheat and corn prices and low Sunspots with high prices. In 2008 73% of the year had days without any sunspots at all. This shocked scientists. There is always a delay, think heater in a fish tank but the whole planet. After 2010 there were some cold snaps.

Now at the peak the sunspots really need to be above around 130 to 140, though there is more involved with geomagnetic storms for one. In the past they have been close to or even slightly over, that we KNOW OF, 300. What the AGW do not get is that is averaging 300 a day over a period of a year. Gradually building up to it and then slowly dropping down. There have been minimums where it never reached zero, which helped in the warming period to warm things up. You can look at this though as far as I am aware this is one of several things only I have mentioned.

So we had a long deep minimum that went from 2008 to 2009 .. and we need to be above 130 or 140 for warming, right?

So would you be shocked to find out the peak in 2014 only hit 88 sunspots? Well not only are we cooling quickly and have been for four years and a harsh winter predicted for many countries but the next solar maximum is predicted to be even lower at 45 and does not arrive until 2024 to 2025. It also needs three years to take effect and is not high enough. The last peak of 88 was not high enough so what do you think 45 will do?

Now the AGW people, who always turn out to be Marxists, leftists and liars and I am talking about thousands of them, state that solar irradiance cannot be affecting climate and has zero influence. Except records show this is not true. But because we have only two or three instances they claim this is not repeated enough. In science you would repeat an experiment a few times and then other teams would do the same. In other words they bastardised the rules of science and actually call everything that opposes them pseudoscience.

A shame they never looked it up because technically pseudoscience is anything that makes assumptions and as they do not have much more than 10% of the data, what are they doing? Assuming.

Well how about this one? They demand peer-reviewed journals and when you find them they then have the audacity like some sort of authority to call them bull within a couple of minutes.

So they claimed solar irradiance has no effect on Earth. Because we are too far away, right?

Well storms have appeared on Mars, Jupiter, Saturn they have not seen before and then a few months ago this scientific paper pops up that states that they have discovered a relationship between solar irradiance and the atmospheres of Venus, Earth and .. TITAN?!

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335927448_On_the_Apparent_Relationship_Between_Total_Solar_Irradiance_and_the_Atmospheric_Temperature_at_1_Bar_on_Three_Terrestrial-type_Bodies

Well its obvious that there are a number of extremely rare events that have either happened a very long time ago or not at all, or have actually happened before we could actually detect them.

Perhaps that back when the Maunder Minimum was starting the planets were all acting up but we did not have the technology back then to view them.

The amount of time we have been able to view them is an absolutely tiny amount of time and we often forget this.

The sheer issues we have with this whole climate change thing comes down to just two things ..

• Political people using it to push agendas
• Naive people that think because it has not happened in their lifetime, their parents lifetimes, grandparents and even grandparents lifetimes then chances are it wont happen

But the Earth with only the period that life has existed on it and other times periods are ..

• 4.1 Billion years with life
• 950 Million years ago whole Earth was frozen
• 10,000 years ago a full deep Ice Age, the Younger Dryas they think happens every 10,000 years
• 370 years ago the Maunder Minimum or Little Ice Age
• Then there is Continental Shift .. we know bugger all about those mechanics
• VEI7 or VEI8 Eruptions
• Magnitude 9.0 or greater Earthquakes
• Pole Excursions
• Pole Reversals

All these are rare .. except a large number now seem to be building up ion their numbers that has made me thing that a large number of things are connected? Like a knock on effect.

Still convinced this will all be shown to be true and within 12 months now, possibly?

Be nice if it was within a month of posting this? Will possibly solve the financial issues forced upon me by the British Government, Google, Twitter and others? My daughter would be ecstatic as would my grandchildren.

Now let us get something else straight .. the recent solar cycles ..

• Solar Cycles run on an 11 year period, most know this and you can look it up
• These can sometime be closer to 10 or 12 years .. long ago one was at 9 I believe?
• The last one ran at 13 years.
• Solar Maximum of Cycle 25 originally should have arrived in 2022
• Currently the next peak likely mid 2024 and counting
• We are still on a solar minimum as of right now
• Three times during 2019 they thought cycle 25 was getting off the ground but went quiet again
• 2008 shocked scientists with 268 spotless days at 73% of the year
• The low solar maximum of 88 sunspots in 2014 shocked scientists
• 2019 and with 28 days to go it is 256 days and at 76%, 77% tomorrow or the day after
• We are on a run of 20 consecutive days without spots
• These seem to have run mostly anywhere between 27 and 32 days thus far
• Personally thing 2019 will end up 277 days. Over 80%

Now IF .. we get to say March or April and we are still in a deep solar minimum I can tell you this, hough some of my side do not see this, it will shock a lot of scientists.

Though saying this there is a single webpage I see that said that its possible the minimum will last into Autumn of 2020. I find this hard to believe. If it did it will blow a lot of minds. Including my own.

Solar minimum means lower activity which means cooler. If its is low then this adds to a cooling effect and if its low for longer this compounds this cooling. If accompanied by low peaks this adds further. But is is not the whole story. Whereas AGW people are quite linear.

When I put these facts to them, along with many others, they literally say its nonsense, insist that 2019 will be the hottest on record and it wont get cooler but warmer. They very literally sound like paid people trying to divert people away from the truth?

But the fact is we live in a very cold universe and we only have two heat sources, though they forget about the second, being the Earth's molten core which itself is also acting up and volcanoes been increasing for years.

They still insist CO2 is continuing to warm, claim they are scientists and we are all stupid, though the real climatologists do pop up they do not hang around more than a few tweets. My points and facts along with those of others get them running for the hills.

I ask them where the extra heat is coming from and state that CO2, or any for of matter, need to absorb heat before it can then emit heat. Matter does not produce its own. Unless some other process is involved, like friction. At this point they either change the subject or start hurling abuse at you. Yes because as they state .. they are all about the science. But get abusive with genuinely relevant questions. They are talking about heat .. you ask them about heat .. they have a meltdown .. get angry and hurl abuse.

There re some incredible predictions coming in. Things I had predicted from like 2023 to 2026, originally, are coming up now. In September and October we have seen all-time records actually fall. For both cold and snow. As a child each Christmas they would talk about the chances, and the odds in bookmakers, on it being a White Christmas for that year. Recall at one stage they said it had not occurred for 75 years. Lord only knows how long ago that is now but must be over 100 today?

See a weather site recently, I use tropical tidbits now, that had around 60% of the UK buried in snow by about the 15^th December?!

A Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event (poorly understood, RARE and from friction as I understand it) is predicted to occur and a month earlier and quite strong. This is in a matter of days and will push polar air much further south. They know now to its full extent of cold and reach but think that the United States, Canada and Europe will be affected.

My prediction to many on social media is thus ..

If we get the harsh winters they are predicting in the northern hemisphere and the countries they state are affected or more then after this winter and with a missing solar cycle 25, if not started by March or April, all anyone or any scientist is going to be thinking about is this lull in solar activity and what will come next.

Now would yo be shocked to hear that after saying back between 2004 and 2009, whatever it was, that there would be no more snow, the glaciers will disappear and the ice caps eventually gone that they are now saying they predicted more cold, ice and snow?

So the message is now that things will continue as they have for tens of thousands of years and its man's fault because of CO2 but you must give them taxes for this and turn western countries into socialist ones where you are not allowed to own anything? Because that will help change .. something? Love to hear what it is they are intending to change?

Now I should say there is one other thing that I focus on but despite it being quite telling its very slow to change. Not looked at this over a long period of time so I do not know if it just is slow or this has been slowed down.

I shall explain ..

Many people think there is a mass conspiracy going on and in all honesty? Yes it now very much looks like it despite never picking up on this. Not only is it the sheer stupid things these scientists say but its the sheer arrogance, ignorance and doing the three monkey's act when you present things to them. They are all about science .. except when you show them scientific papers that they demand, because they think that if your unfamiliar with these then they can win you over to their side, they rubbish them without even looking at them. The ones that claim they are scientists and all about the science refuse to read scientific papers but claim that they read them.

• Solar Cycles
• Sunspots
• Seismic Activity Increases
• Volcanic Activity Increases
• Magma Movement
• Poles Shifting
• Magnetic Field Weakening
• Upper Atmosphere Cooling
• Unusual animal migration (magnetic fields)
• Atmospheric Phenomenon like Sundogs, Blue Lightning, Sprites, Purple Sunsets
• Increases to record levels of Noctilucent (Ice) Clouds
• Increased Meteor activity NASA somehow missed

Not a single reaction fro the AGW scientists. All irrelevant it turns out too? Now factor in these are all unprecedented and therefore extremely rare or even never seen before. The simple obvious fact that these are all occurring at the exact same time is entirely lost on these scientists?

Leaving aside the stupid things they say this alone makes it look like a conspiracy and they are paid to spread misinformation on Twitter.

Even looking at the last one on the list ..

• Sun's magnetic field acting up
• Earth's magnetic field acting up
• Occurrences in the atmosphere's of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn
• Is Titan affected?
• If other magnetic fields are acting up I am sure this will have zero affect on lumps of rocks riddled with metal floating about the solar system, right?

Some months ago I watched a video by Anton Petrov on YouTube, What Da Math, who announced a number of things of late that were wrong I though were wrong. No troubles with expanding universe but I was convinced is was not constant. Turns out it is not now.

In one he stated that after a up-tick in meteors being spotted and filmed that NASA stated that were were in an increased period which they had not previously .. noticed?

Now I have suspected that they have know for awhile what is coming? That the all the madness in the world right now is one big distraction to prevent people from realising? To stop panic, maybe? More inclined to think it is to protect the financial markets and I have gone into this previously in this long series.

Adding to the suspicions is this and this is directly connected to the slow to update graph I am heading towards.

• Hard to find up to date graphs for anything
• Magnetic Pole locations
• Climate Change Predictive Models
• Seismic Activity Frequency
• Volcanic Activity Frequency

It is almost as if they do not want you to know about the last two years or more? What it takes to or three years to get the previous numbers on a graph and post it online?

Also curious are the predictive models for climate change. I have seen several running from 2009 where the observational temps were running along the bottom of a spread of predictions so wide they would make an Kalashnikov blush.

In 2014 former NASA Climatologist and author Roy Spencer PhD published a predictive model and wrote a piece as to why 95% of them had failed. Out of around 8 I have seen .. more than half show a sharp decline in global temperatures. Just two showed a rise at the time it was created and these were slow inclines. The latest one I could find shows a very sharp decline between 2015 and 2017 and was almost as if it was added because after 2014 they knew temps would drop so much that their models would appear to look like fakes?

I have very literally had to annotate them to add in the decline of 2018 and 2019 as we are very almost into 2020. By then the latest graph will be three years out of date. Are they scared to give us the latest graphs?

The AGW go nuts over my annotations and declare them false. Been told since July, as they are all now clairvoyant these scientists, that 2019 was going to be either the hottest on record or the second hottest?! Really do not understand the laws of thermodynamics these people.

I like the numbers .. I like the facts .. and I like puzzles. I hate corruption and lies and yet I am dealing with both of these things at the exact same time. Along with this incessant need the AGW have to ignore being proven wrong and just repeat the same shit over and over and over again. Not exaggerating here.

My side on one of two threads will tell you its very common for the AGW to retweet their own tweets easily more than 50 and over 100 times in the space of a day or two.

With my short term memory problems and series of pains from my health condition this was very irritating, which it would be for anyone. So I have had to keep a ..

• Series of browser tabs open
• Document of tweets and links saved and open
• Bookmarks page open

So when I say these people are mad, liars, arrogant and ignorant opportunists and off the chain with it I am not exaggerating in the slightest.

Now for my key but slowly moving graph which the AGW also state is nonsense after a failed attempt to lie about it and state it was not that which I claimed. For a few moments they even convinced me and I thought I had read it wrong?

COSMIC RAYS

Please be aware these are not rays but particles which can come from the Sun as well as deep space.

As the Sun is acting up with its sunspots and magnetic field, which is what a solar cycle is .. the Sun's field flips every 11 years, so is ours.

Added to this the magnetic field is weakening because the poles are on the move and as the atmosphere drops in temperature so to does it collapse or shrink. They are already worried about satellites being affected ..

• Satellites move at a speed and experience drag, if this drops they move at a different speed
• Van Allen Belts weaken letting in more rays and particles
• Magnetic Field weakening lets in more rays and particles

UV goes up as do other things and they most certainly are and have been for more than a decade and satellites lose their protection.

For awhile now and I have read he reports, they are worried that at some point a big solar storm occurring could throw satellites out of whack, damage them or even destroy them completely.

GPS systems are already being affected and there are concerns that mobile phones, the Internet and even power grids will go down.

Cosmic Rays also get in and along with other things like dust fro the increased volcanic eruptions these seed clouds. You can even find evidence of this I have already mentioned. Noctilucent Clouds. Fascinating, beautiful and rare these form around the poles in the summer. They are not only the highest clouds of all, in the mesosphere, they are made of ice. These have been increasing in recent years and been at record levels more than once.

Oddly while their season is at one pole the Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, if these are things occur, do their thing at the opposite pole. For some reason SSWs are much rarer at the south pole than they are at the north. But they have had two events recently and I am very interested to see if they get another in their winter. Around June or July 2020. If this occurs I believe this will be, possibly, the first time they have had consecutive occurrences of an SSW down there? They believe the last one was responsible for the unusual snow in Australia and New Zealand?

I believe these two things of NLCs and SSWs are a sign. Might interest you to know that the first time they noticed the NLCs was after Krakatoa erupted? It is believed the famous painting 'The Scream' and its purple skies was after an volcanic eruption.

The sole thing about science is coming up with ideas, a hypothesis, then forming theories you can test but this is not something you can test. In the absence of this all you can do is look for patterns and links between things.

This is exactly what I do and what I seem to be good at, picked up by others at college where I solved something in my head they told us you could not do. Boy did I get a lot of questions after that one.

I also did this during my university degree in computer science which resulted in a distinction for my thesis that involved animal science, I was already an expert in, computing and led to me being pressured to do a PhD. Stupidly I thought I was tool old and at the time I was asked to do this I had interest from major Museums and Zoos on both sides of the Atlantic because an animal expert and top lawyer I knew at the time located near Harley Street, Stephen Peltz, had met me and was telling everyone what I did at college. Before I went to university. My college got interested in my ideas and work too and one lecturer wanted to do it with me but let slip “I can make lots of money while you get experience to take to university”

I was a mature student at the time and three friends I had told me to run away and not look back. The lecturers name was Mike Smith.

People got interested at Middlesex University too .. one really nice guy was Alastare Measures who had previously worked for the London Stock Exchange. He had health issues and then got involved with fellow lecturer Tamsin. Their romance was kept a secret, even from fellow lecturers and I was the only one that knew. In fact our friendship got noticed and one lecturer, Janet if I recall, announced they were getting married and looked at me and said 'You already knew this, didn't you?' to which all the student looked at me in shock as I smiled and said “Yes, yes I did”

I only knew this because his condition used to flare up under stress. I was the only one that knew they were dating and I was asking him about his condition when I looked at him and said ..

“You .. you have asked her to marry you, haven't you? This is why your condition has flared up so much?”

He admitted to this and I told him not to worry .. I am very good at keeping things under wraps because people think that I talk about everything. Which has always made things somewhat easier.

Yeah so I see things. Do not know how though I have long had a theory about this.

I linked things together in science in this very series that got noticed, one time by an author who wanted to collaborate with me. He is in America and this was something I felt honoured over and had long, long longed to work with others on my level. Or even higher than my own level.

Thinking me crazy a decade ago .. many, that also previously believed in AGW, now firmly believe I was right all along. Not only on climate change and everything else I predicted and got right but also that there has been a concerted effort via the social media giants to silence me.

Google via Blogger (unfortunately) and YouTube along with Twitter and now I have noticed impossible peculiarities on both GAB and Minds which have both started behaving very differently, but will get to that in another post. Recently an animal expert who had been bugging me to film a very rare plant we had located as he was sure I would get tens of thousands of views in a matter of days. I did film it and after a few weeks of being online and with all the tags in place I had one view. He noticed this and said 'I see your video, you had a single view?! How is that even possible?! You were right, they are messing with you online!”

I made this worse. I told him the exact same video was on BitChute but not many people know about it, like YouTube, and there are no tags and no followers. But the same video had been seen 60 times and that is a 6,000% improvement. She shook his head in disbelief.

So yeah I see things. As I said I have a theory about this.

So yeah sometimes it takes it sweet time but I started to notice things about the graphs and statements I was getting to see via this climate change thread.

Many of the graphs I looked at simply did not add up and I am sorry but this can only mean skulduggery.

With several sharp inclines and Roy Spencer stating in 2014 more than 95% of the climate models had failed and with a sharp drop between 2015 ish and 2018 .. the observational line is STILL within the bottom of the predictions?! I also have some very .. and I mean VERY suspicious account on Twitter reassuring me that the predictive models are doing well and as predicted?

Constantly skimming the bottom of the predicted model set and someone telling me that one it is actually matching is a Russian model that did not even factor in CO2 which would mean all those based on CO2 have failed?

With several sharp inclines its still barely within these boundaries? Now MAYBE .. more models get added with the predictions getting lower? Possibly?

This is also underhanded. Like in the ClimateGate incident where someone wrote to the climatologists if the University of East Anglia and wanted access to their raw data and the response was .. paraphrasing here .. 'Why? So you can make the models look bad? Sorry but we do not release that data'

Or .. we are adjusting the data without explaining how or why and you are just going to have to trust us.

Added to this they used the word 'trick' in emails to each other when speaking about adjusting the data. But corruption and scandal ridden Environmental Protection Agency of the Unites States investigated, there was an investigation in the UK too, found nothing other than two error in the data?

In the document they have the gall to talk about public trust after all that shite? Nope .. gone! And you have to be an absolute IDIOT to expect trust from the public after all of that. It is gone and s never coming back.

So with all that in mind here are cosmic ray graphs and most noticeable is the bottom one and you will note that in the last decade they have been high? They were not only high in the last deep solar minimum of 2008 to 2009 but were also higher in the solar maximum of solar cycle 24 than they had previously. They are currently almost as high as 2008, which was almost off the top end of the graph!

Only the graph s said to be updated every 5 minutes and yet I have not seem much of a rise from its already high rate in several months?

What is also unusual about this, which may or may not be a thing, is that with 2019 being deeper than 2008 with its solar maximum, 76% currently to 73% for the latter, this should technically be higher? Possibly?

Maybe there is a delay and its destined to go higher than 2008? But thus far and for a few months now it does not look to his risen very much?

CHINA & THE COOLING PERIOD

I had heard of a study by Chinese scientists. This was not long after finding out Michael Mann and his smoothed out graph with no Maunder Minimum or Little Ice Age actually tried to state it was local and not global. That was a real shocker .. NO .. it was not local.

Was as study in South America for one and his use of the Dust Veil Index was so bad .. it had to be amateurish or wilfully lying.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141119204521.htm

Backing up what I had stated since 2000 two separate teams of scientists confirmed that things had been warming for around 6,000 years .. meaning no it has not ONLY been warming since the Industrial Revolution. So Michael Mann, Greta Thunberg and the blind cult are either catastrophically wrong yet again or wilfully lying?

Now the funny thing is it was the AGW cult that posted this in their defence but just like everything else over 4 months .. it did not state what they claimed .. OBSERVE ..

“Research sheds light on 500-year Chinese weather cycle and suggests a cool change could be on the way”

“A new study has found winters in northern China have been warming since 4,000BC “

“Dr Wu Jing, from the Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said the study had found no evidence of human influence on northern China’s warming winters”

“Wu and her colleagues are concerned that, as societies grow more used to the concept of global warming, people will develop a misplaced confidence in our ability to control climate change”

“As a result of the research findings, Wu said she was now more worried about cooling than warming”

“There are already alarming signs [OF COOLING], according to their paper”

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3022136/china-scientists-warn-global-cooling-trick-natures-sleeve

Once this was pointed out they then started to rubbish the article .. except it was them that posted it and it was a peer-reviewed paper like they demand and was a second study confirming the first by a different team of scientists.

Yes you did in fact read that correctly. I had already heard of this study and likely posted a link to the actual scientific paper? Because it had mentioned warming some AGW cult members posted this as their evidence AGW was real.

As is always the case with these people you go through it and it does not state that which they claim.

• Idiot opportunists or
• Knowingly Lying
• Most state they do both

I was not aware that there had been two studies by different teams of scientists until I went through this article.

What shocked me is it backed up what I had stated about it being way cooler in Italy, ergo Europe, long before the Industrial Revolution. This meant that warming did NOT start after the Industrial Revolution like they claim.

I can also tell you this .. I have not only destroyed scientific papers they have presented in the many dozens, including one by Michael Mann who tried to claim the Little Ice Age was localized, but have presented dozens if not a few hundred scientific papers of my own. Because unless peer-reviewed it was all 'sheet sawce' unless of course it was something they were presenting.

I made a whole list of hashtags it was that preposterous ..

• #NotMyScienceSiteDespiteJustUsingIt
• #NotMyScienceJournal
• #NotMyNASAScientist
• #NotMyClimatologist
• #NotMyFakeNews .. oddly they love linking the Guardian and Independent two old favourites of mine I would not pish on if they was on fire today

Yes. That ridiculous. To the point I asked them if their arms were constantly aching carrying about those goal-posts all the time?

• I destroy their links with explanations, quotes, maths, history
• But they have beaten me and proven me wrong consistently with
  • Sheet Sawce
  • Climate Denier Site
    • Think about this .. would I use a AGW promoting site to argue my sceptic case? That is the level of absurdity
  • Science Illiterate
  • You promote pseudoscience
  • You are a pseudoscientist
  • You are an idiot
  • You are far-right
  • You are a racist
  • You promote paedophiles
  • You are against nature
• Number of times they have genuinely explained why I am wrong is a single and very round number

If you follow anyone like this or believed their horror stories .. trust me your are in a while can of worms there without even being aware of it. I was not until around a year ago.

SUDDEN ATMOSPHERIC WARMING EVENTS

During my many months of battles I brought up some simple facts about the atmosphere that the experts seemed to be oblivious about. The sheer number of these was astounding and in each and every case they claimed that they knew and dismissed by arguments. Later I manage to trip them up and show that they were totally unfamiliar with events and terms.

So they accused me of both being wrong and lying and as it turns out it was they that were wrong and their accusation that I lied was itself a lie.

One of these involved the limited data on the atmosphere in climate models. This was already bad enough because many models and papers they cited did not include solar activity or volcanoes, or precious little.

The universe is incredibly cold and we have but two heat sources and they are arguing about warming. One of these is the Sun. The other is the Earth's core. Not all volcanoes are monitored and they rule out Sunspots because there has only been a couple of instances of a Grand Solar Minimum and the Little Ice Age. So if this was not bad enough ..

• Mesosphere starts at 50,000 feet
• Cannot be monitored continuously as it is too high for balloons and too low for satellites
• They use rockets to take measurements
• The Mesosphere also is the home of Noctilucent Clouds which are rare, made up of ice crystals and first seen after Krakatoa erupted (BIG CLUE)
• Noctilucent Clouds have been on the increase at ever record breaking rates
• Believe that NLCs and SSWs are signs we should pay attention to

So they claimed the mesosphere was a lot higher than it actually was and was monitored by satellites. Both were bullshit. Funny how a live model that I and many others use does not even go to the top of the stratosphere and tops out at 26,500 feet, no?

Observe ..

https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/10hPa/overlay=temp/orthographic=-16.00,38.98,300/loc=-0.530,52.240

All this is very easily verifiable on a great many sites. Except they accused this of being wrong and lies. The one that did was a new AGW name and after several posts from me they vanished without trace.

Upper atmosphere is cooling due to weak Sun activity and as a result it is contracting. AGW people often cite temperatures thousands of miles away and I remind them that a few thousand feet above their heads its very cold and gets colder the higher you go.

All ignored and told was irrelevant.

Yeah except they failed to realise that what I was talking about was already a thing and had a name and have to point out these are not seasonal but rare. I also knew that due to what the 'W' stood for in the name they would jump all over it proving they have not got a clue what they are talking about.

A Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event, or SSW, is a little understood thing. Here are the main points to remember about them ..

• Sudden contraction of upper atmosphere
• Occurs at the poles in its winter time
• Warming, as I understand it, come from friction from the collapse
• This pushes cold air away from the poles further south in the north and north in the south
• These are rare at the north pole and curiously ..
• Even rare at the south pole

Got all that? OK then ..

• We have a fair few in the north in recent years
• They have had a couple close together at the south, just had one they blamed for snow in Australia
• Currently predicting a strong one that will have an effect within a matter of days of posting this, if not already?
• Thought it was cold? It is looking to get a great deal colder and even the UK is being predicted to stay below freezing constantly for three months

It is absolutely stunning what little understanding or knowledge the AGW have in various sciences and how they believe something not proved but continue to insist that it has.

They ignore every bit of info, facts and data provided to them and then call us the 'science deniers' to the point it has become ludicrous. 'Climate Deniers' is one of their latest ones and we continue to ask 'who the hell denies climate?!'

They claim that weather is not climate. It is. They claim that a three four year trend of continuous cooling is not a trend. I point out they had three decades to both prove and predict and it has been disastrous. I also point out their hypocrisy as they say it cannot be the Sun because the effects have not been immediate, or have taken three years and counting? But taking 30 years and counting is perfectly OK for them but 3 years for sceptics is too long? Stunning.

Be careful who you listen to and do not disagree with them openly. They will turn on you like a pack of ravenous Wolves.

Now the cold records, just for the US alone, prior to three storms and BEFORE the SSW occurring?

https://electroverse.net/over-the-last-30-days-the-u-s-set-a-total-of-8742-new-all-time-low-temperature-records-vs-just-the-1832-max/

https://watchers.news/2019/11/22/potential-major-stratospheric-warming-event/

https://electroverse.net/ssw-event-could-divert-the-polar-express-to-europe-and-north-america-this-holiday-season/

Now as I suspected and as the word 'warming' was in the name they AGW jumped on it and laughed and ended up with egg on their faces. This has happened with them so many times and yet they have yet to leave me with egg on mine. When they do they claim an overall win. I now call this 'AUTOWIN'.

Think of a football team winning 50 to 0 but right in the last minute the losing side scores. Now imagine that this losing side insist that they won and demand to pick up the trophy? Would be insane, right?

Except every single time you prove a leftist. Marxist, Antifa or AGW wrong they either return and repeat the same thing again or just move onto their next bold claim without batting en eyelid. Never have they so much as acknowledged they are wrong, let alone apologized!

If you put these Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events to an AGW believer you will get one of two responses depending on whether they have heard of them or not ..

• See? Its warming and CO2 is causing it
• This is as we predicted and is a result of CO2 affecting the atmosphere

Except ..

• Not caused by CO2
• Spreads cold not warmth
• They never predicted SSWs
• They never predicted cold weather and I have looked
• They never predicted snow and I have looked, quite the opposite
• They cannot link them to anything as they are little understood by anyone
• They are associated with contraction ..
• Contraction I have talked about for months as the atmosphere cools .. physics 101
• So how can they tell you its warming because that would cause expansion and it is most certainly contracting

Now here is a video from a couple years ago by someone studying it. He talks about the contraction and he that it is poorly understood and will take several years before we do.

SEA TEMPERATURES

“Atlantic temperature trends reflect warming over recent centuries, including that associated with anthropogenic influences, whereas the Pacific is still cooling as a consequence of ongoing replacement of Medieval Warm Period waters by Little Ice Age waters”

“Proxy records show that before the onset of modern anthropogenic warming, globally coherent cooling occurred from the Medieval Warm Period to the Little Ice Age”

“The ocean adjusts to surface temperature anomalies over time scales greater than 1000 years in the deep Pacific” whereas the Atlantic its over a much shorter time."

“Southern Ocean cooling between 600 and 1600 CE” but the AGW people have been stating, via a Michael Mann paper which was erroneous with its Dust Veil Index use, that the Little Ice Age was NOT global. They literally posted that on a blog .. and from one that calls others far-right and evil for not stating AGW is real. Yeah except this paper has been out since January 2019 and its 29^th November at the time of writing. Lord knows when the study in South America has been out? Which also proved the Little Ice Age was global."

“That the deep Pacific gains heat in this scenario, referred to as EQ-1750, confirms that heat loss in OPT-0015 results from the cooling associated with entry into the Little Ice Age”

Now take a note of this taken fro the body of this work and then that taken fro the abstract ..

“Atlantic temperature trends reflect warming over recent centuries, including that associated with anthropogenic influences”

“Proxy records show that before the onset of modern anthropogenic warming”

Do you see a problem here? The 'Abstract' contradicts the paper! It is misleading .. almost as if every time someone writes a paper there is some rule that they have to include a reference to AGW in a way that suggests it is a proven fact?

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6422/70

SEA LEVEL RISE

I use volcanoes, among other things, a lot in my arguments and every single time these are dismissed out of hand immediately. Despite the fact I point out things no one ever talks about. That 71% of Earth is covered in water. Estimated one to three million volcanoes under the sea. None of them monitored most erupt undetected.

The USGS admitted publicly that they do not monitor enough volcanoes above land. That they realised only around 2017 that the emit CO2 long before they actually erupt. This public announcement was made after I had them reply to a couple of tweets. More or less treating me like some village idiot. It did not go well for them. I pointed out a few simple and should have been obvious facts. What I said was that its obvious to everyone many things are rising in frequency and if at any point you get a VEI6 eruption or two .. or higher then they had better hide and not admit to anyone they worked for the USGS. Two weeks later they make the announcement they are not monitoring enough volcanoes which was reported by GSM News who now follow me. As does David Dubyne of Adapt 2030 on YouTube.

None of this is a factor according to the Marxists, leftists and Extinction Rebellion types but 3% of the CO2 that humans cause which itself makes up only 0.04% of the atmosphere has catastrophic effects though, right?

Put simply .. you could remove all of the CO2 tomorrow that has been emitted by man and you still wont stop the CO2 levels from rising. If you look up ancient records of climate you will also find that CO2 was been higher than today by several factors .. it was also damn cold when it was too.

Just to point out at this stage that every single chart you look at, which remember is incomplete as it is only volcanoes above sea-level, show a significant and constant rise over 50 years give or take. In fact if you take any of these charts along with the charts for geomagnetic pole movement these both match CO2 charts. Global temperatures does not, another thing they claimed that was disproved.

"Climate models without pre-industrial volcanic forcing underestimate historical ocean thermal expansion"

https://iac.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/usys/iac/iac-dam/documents/group/climphys/knutti/publications/gregory13grl.pdf

It was put forward by someone else that the measurements of sea-level rise, over 100 years I think, were within the margin of error. Now remember these faith following Guessoscientists call us 'science deniers' and this was the response from an Antifa member who owns a Karl Marx book, claims he is a Marine Biologist but does not know why Flamingos are pink or animals get their colour ..

'That is dismissing data you do not like'

They claim it is irrelevant when you point out the volcanoes are on the increase and warmer water expands. I mean your talking within the margin of error here! With zero consideration to what effect on water temps one to three million volcanoes have that are increasing in the frequency of eruptions?

CAN TALK ABOUT WARMING BUT NOT COOLING

Odd then that they say we are in the Age Of Aquarius and yet I biggest problem is going to be water in the form of snow, ice and floods?

People are bizarre .. I do like social media as I am surrounded by sand-heads, as I call them, who wanted to talk about global warming when they thought that was real. Realizing I was right a few years back now they do not even want to talk about the global cooling. Not that the do not believe it because they do. They said its too scary and I said ..

'what will be scary is sticking your head in a bucket until its too late and then panicking about what to do'

Said this a great many times to people when I get frustrated with their sandhead attitudes ..

'When you realize it is coming and closer then you thought all everyone I know is going to want to do is ask me a million questions. When you do .. DON'T! Tried to tell you and you did not want to know. I will have my own plans to carry out if I am able and I wont have the time to stand around answering a million questions and my answer will be; you had your chance and you did not want to listen!'

My daughter gets frustrated with people too and she waits for the day when social media stops screwing me and I can move out of my current and horrific situation, deal with my pain issues and replace my failing equipment.

But along with the tech giants slowing me down .. the blogs do not seem to trigger payments despite there being way more visiting them than there were three years ago when the earnings suddenly ceased.

She keeps thinking, as does another friend, that I will suddenly get help. Though they have started to ask why it has not been offered after everything I have done for so long.

I tell them that .. I have not really, in actual fact, revealed that I do need help. Maybe before Christmas 2019? Maybe?

EXTINCTION REBELLION

David Dubyne along with Sandi Shaw, Piers Corbyn and Mark Windows at an event in Glastonbury Hall right here in the UK and it gets gate crashed by two from Extinction Rebellion who start off shouting them down, then the 'climate deniers' bullshit starts, then he lies and first says he is an XR founder before changing that to 'I have worked with them a long time'. At the end of the day they end up sounding like two fruit-loops and get thrown out.

They sound an awful lot like every other one of these climate cult people I ran into day in and day out and in my next blog post I will get into the crazy things they come out with. Along with what they do and do not know. Which is very little for the former and an incredible amount for the latter.

They are more concerned with a threat that is many decades away, they have shifted it now to 2100, and is getting further way all the time than they are say plastic in the oceans. Or the Cascadia Subduction Zone mega-thrust earthquake that can happen within within 150 to 500 years.

Due to how close this is to the west coast of the Unites States there would be very little warning, other than the shaking from the earthquake itself. This could be a magnitude 8.0 or even 9.0 and if the earthquake itself was not devastating enough the Tsunami would be as bad or worse.

How many people live on or near the west coast of America? Well .. 500 years between quakes might seem like it is a long way off. Except it can happen in as little as 150 years and they now know the last one occurred around December 1700.

So 320 years ago then. That is if their calculations are exact and its not 400 years? Some seem to think that it is likely to occur within 50 years. But it could happen next week? Or tomorrow? There is no way of knowing.

There are a great many things that these people could be concerned with and yet they are not. They instead focus of what is essentially guesswork and maybes. Only there is no way this AGW is for real and with temperatures currently dropping, have been for four years and will continue to do for at least 6 or 7 its getting further and further away.

Have wondered if this dropping is why they moved the disaster date all the way forward now until 2100?

They sense the end as Greta Thunberg has stepped up their pressure .. but the cat is out of the proverbial bag. Sands of time are clearly running out.

https://twitter.com/JuliaHB1/status/1200455476691054596

Now if it is now set at 2100 you have to consider something else .. what would the technology be in just 50 years time? In other words we would have developed all the things to ignore it.

Except if it cools for the next 7 years CO2 would have long been disproved as being behind any warming.

In actual fact I am fairly sure the whole AGW thing will be dead and buried by Spring 2020, in as little as 6 months time as of the time of writing.

Now I will get into why this is.

THE SEVERE PREDICTIONS

Britain's worst winter was in 1963. I have stated that I think this might be beaten .. by 2026 .. then I started moving this forward. And forward. And forward.

Started to think there was a possibility of 2020 and even maybe this year?

Then someone tweeted this tweet ..

https://twitter.com/doctorbarnes1/status/1200522759295639552

We have had tens of thousands of record broken from September to the present, 30^th November today, and we had those incredible temperatures in the US and other places at the start of the year. Photos that were shocking as well as impressive. You want to know how the weather really is .. ask a farmer. Their Spring of 2019 started very, very late. By around a month I think it was? They spent all year suspecting and worried that the winter would start early. It did.

I ran a story reporting that in Canada 2.7 million acres of Canola, do not even know what that is, got buried in snow a few weeks ago and so much so that they would not be able to get to it until Spring 2020 which is also predicted to be late. Maybe even later than 2019? When I ran the story I asked the AGW why they had not warned the farmers about this because after stating there would be no more snow after 2014 and never mentioning once there would be an increase of snow they now were actually stating that they predicted this. Though they could not produce a single article supporting this and I went through dozens of their and .. nothing.

Now they talked about the crazy weather and I stated that I had predicted this for the entire globe back in January when I started this series. I also pointed out that they had not, but were now trying to claim that they did. They did rant on about a few hot days in France and some in Thailand, I think it was, from like June or July.

However this turned out to be more cherry picking as they totally omit cold .. like a report about western Russia having record cold temperature in July.

https://electroverse.net/all-time-record-low-temperatures-tumble-in-northwest-russia/

Russia forecast to have their largest ever November snow fall?

https://electroverse.net/regions-of-russia-forecast-to-receive-their-largest-november-snow-totals-ever-recorded/

Half of Russia buried in snow ..

https://electroverse.net/half-of-russia-buried-in-snow/

Russia at -54 Celsius in November ..

https://electroverse.net/extreme-november-cold-engulfs-russia-lows-of-54c-65-2f-recorded/

Seen and posted reports on social media regarding China, India, Bolivia, Chile and more than half a dozen countries in South America along with Spain, yes Spain, getting a lot of snow. Canada and the US. Localized they said. Wrong. Winter they said. Also wrong.

Another report from November 20^th stated that 8,742 cold records were broken as opposed to 1,832 max records. You have to take into account that the cold records were by several degrees to as much as 25 degree below average or even all-time records.

https://electroverse.net/over-the-last-30-days-the-u-s-set-a-total-of-8742-new-all-time-low-temperature-records-vs-just-the-1832-max/

Interestingly the AGW did not like me pointing this out and the differences of several to dozens of degree differences for lows and a few tenths of a degree to a couple of degrees for highs. They then go into this mode ..

• If the find a record max temp it is AGW and Global
• If you show them a record low it is just weather and/or localized
• That bad
• They obviously have no clue how averages work or just wilfully lying

The Express, and other sites, ran a report that it has been predicted that the UK, refer you back to the tweet above, would have a record winter and very possibly our first white Christmas in like 100 years or so? It stated that for three whole months the temperatures would remain below zero!

My side not quite so confident in my stating that in 2020 the AGW and CO2 argument will be dead as they think there is afar too much corruption and money in it.

However one AGW freakoid posted a paper from January to show that most of the world believed AGW was a real problem. Only I have one from July. Comparing the countries involved, of which there was around 6 that matched up, this 'belief' had dropped by a great amount.

In some cases this went from around 80% to less than 50%.

As their paper was published in January 2019 it would have been carried out before the winter started in 2018 .. ore perhaps at the very latest, early winter. January to March 2019 was quite a shock to the system for many people. So the massive drops in this belief would make total sense. They rubbished the Statista graph of course.

On my graph only three countries were in the majority when it came to believing AGW and one was India at around 76%. One was Spain and only fractionally in the majority is here in the UK with 51% of the population.

Bit of a problem there as out of everyone I know no one believes AGW is real any longer bar one person who himself is a scientist and we have a mutual friend who tells him what I say and he says I am an idiot. Unfortunately my facts got too much and he asked out mutual friend not to talk about it any longer. Knowing him for 40 years my friend told me “I know him of old and this is when he has been shown to be wrong. He suddenly gets angry about it and tells you not to talk about something any more”. Spent a long time, as our mutual friend admits, proving that particular one wrong. A very long time.

Oddly we still have yet to have a bad winter in the UK, like the winters of old. I recall, shame the AGW do not know this, the tabloids predicting worst winter approaching several times in the last decade and we laughed it off and it never arrived.

As I said when I saw all the data to various areas of science and previously linked them together I realised we would indeed get a serious winter by 2026. Them moved this forward to 2024 .. then I thought maybe 2022. Told the friend I referred to previously on the phone that we are going to get one within a year or two, earlier in the year. Then I said I might have to move this forward to 2020-21 before I then started to tell him we might even get it this 2019 to 2020 season?

This was after looking at the Noctilucent Clouds and record highs and the Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event at the south pole they blamed for the snow in Australia.

Then reports were coming in of not only a strong SSW at the north pole but a very early one and not only did I start to wonder if this was part of the mechanics in an ice-age, regardless of little or deep, but a very early one too. As I understand it they tend to appear in January but they were talking about early December. Around the 5^th to the 9^th of December? Hence the reports of the UK, Europe, US and Canada being affected and the three months below zero.

No matter which way you slice it .. the Sun has been going down in activity from 2004, you have to allow 3 or 4 years for effect, and was asleep by 2008. This was followed by a low maximum of 88 Sunspots in 2014 that shocked scientists across the world. It was too low to warm the global temperatures. A scientist on the BBC, video I posted in previous part, stated no harsh winters because of all the CO2 which was immediately followed by three harsh winters. The Sun in 2019 is on course to beat the 73% of spotless days that shocked scientists and currently at 76% with the whole of December to go and a run of 17 days without sunspots. It should be obvious to everyone now that when you look at the claims since 2008 .. they simply do not add up.

I looked at a dozen predictive global temperature models with all the lines for each of the over 100 models. In each case from 2010 most had a current sharp decline. Two or three showed a gradual slow incline. In 2014 NASA climatologist and author Roy Spencer PhD stated that 95% of models were wrong. Also changed and said CO2 not doing anything. Latest graph shows sharp decline from around 2015 to 2017. The following two years have gotten progressively colder. 2020 will have a very bad start too because its predicted to be bad up until the end of February.

With 95% failed in 2014 and two or more graphs after that showing sharp declines how can it be that ..

• The observational temps are still just about within the wide spread of predictions?
• Why do the AGW tell me that the models are fine despite the fact that its on the lower edge of wide spread and they refuse to admit the Sun will cause the temps to get colder?
• How do they even insist fro July onwards that 2019 was going to be the hottest?

It is utter madness. You cannot have it both ways .. your either catastrophically wrong or you are willfully lying.

What I also found to be bizarre in the last year of running into these people is in each and every case they are Antifa members, Marxists, socialists or something else ion the far left and they all have proven to be willfully lying. You can literally show them inescapable facts disproving something they have claimed. They will disappear and then return a day or two later, knowing the tweet disproving them is long gone, and repeat the exact some things you have disproved?

They also use word salads, as we call them, and as soon as they cannot argue against something they twist things around, redefine words and terms and literally go through a long list they have of different fallacies can see if, even loosely, they can use it as a defence.

They did this many thousands of times while despite even using logical fallacies themselves no one on the side of sceptics used this as an argument.

The stunning part of all this is the anger, swearing and the condescending way they communicate .. it really does take some believing. I had followers come into the room to debate and within a day or two had to leave, block them all or mute the thread. They told me there was no debate and they had never seen anything like it. Just shouting you down with bullshit and they were obviously not looking at your links or graphs while posting ones that did not back up what they said.

I have gotten so tired of it .. but I used it to find out more information from others as well as get a handle on the arguments this cult were using and how they operated.

In the end they either ran way or only come back in spurts while trying to control their anger and statements because even myself alone kept reducing their follower numbers by exposing their lies and anger.

I also used memes of the Pied Piper and consistently showed that they viewed their followers and naïve and blind rats and feed them bullshit to keep them on side.

I did not even keep a constant check but I saw one that liked to argue with me lose more than ten followers at least 6 or 7 times. Since we went to war .. his followers were at minus 15 while mine were plus 400 or more, and this included mine going down from followers being suspended .. or as they do .. Twitter just knocking them off.

Many predictions they made already have turned out correct, only one out of well over a dozen, the UK, did not turn out as predicted. Except a prediction a few days later of a lot of snow did.

We all know that Arizona in the USA is a very hot and dry desert with scorpions, tarantulas, snakes and likely tortoises and as its been warming for three decades they are probably all dead from lack of water and intense heat. As AGW climate change is in a critical state by now and .. oh wait? Is that .. snow fall?!

https://weather.com/safety/winter/news/2019-11-29-winter-storm-california-west-thanksgiving-travel-roads-airports

SVANTE ARRENIUS & CO2

The AGW people love to quote a scientist fro years ago called Svante Arrhenius as he was the first to comment about man putting CO2 in the atmosphere. They probably like to mention him because it has been reported that Greta Thunberg is said to be his descendant.

He was mentioned a dozen times by people who later on vanished and is yet another example of me looking into something they kept repeating and linking to. Yes he did comment on it and it was a very long time ago he spoke about it. They left out a few things though.

He stated that over time this would be a good thing. When I pointed this out they then tried to shift the goal-posts like they do on everything and state that it had gone way beyond what he had stated. No it did not and had it been a thing of possibility I am sure that an eminent scientist would have mentioned then within as little as a 100 years or so it would become a problem.

This is just another in hundreds if not thousands of instances where they cherry picked as they did with Karl Popper. They worshipped philosopher Karl Popper but as it turned out the reasoning they were using to rule out my arguments were directly opposed to what Karl Popper himself stated.

Also .. there are those of us that work with plants and CO2. Remember ..

• CO2 only makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere
• Man is responsible for 3% of that
• It has been shown for decades, CO2 units are used for aquarium plants, that ..
• Plants grow more as the atmosphere goes up to 1% to 6% and some plants 9% CO2
• Socialists, Marxists, Extinction Rebellion want to do away with meat eating and only eat plants
• Now think about that

Here are two links to that Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius ..

http://sealevel.info/ScientificAmerican_1920-11-27_CO2_fertilization.html

Now then .. let me correct a mistake I noticed in an old post where I posted the same video twice and missed a vitally important one!

Now hold on to your butts for this one ..

Stated many times that it volcanoes were responsible for the CO2 rise and was called a liar and an idiot denier and present with quite old papers apparently disproving this. Did not need to even read them to know they were wrong.

I explained that only a few years ago they discovered that no only do volcanic eruptions emit CO2 but that they discovered they do this long before erupting and were developing sensors to detect the CO2 to raise alerts and save lives.

Was still called an idiot, liar and wrong. As I was when I explain that 71% of the Earth is covered in water and one to three million volcanoes are not monitored and under the sea. They do not monitor all volcanoes even above land. If you look at graphs that show you poles shifting and volcanic eruption frequency they both rise identically to that of CO2 graphs. Temperatures do not.

Here is the video I had long lost after realising my earlier mistake, but have which since found and if you only watch 5 minutes make sure it is around the 40.00 minute mark.

SCIENTISTS & FUNDING

So along with scientists from the US, Australia and UK, some even telling me directly, a large number of scientists, despite the claims from the hard-left pushing for power, do not agree with CO2 being behind climate change but are scared to speak out for fear of losing their jobs. Like Susan Crockford, over Polar Bears, and Peter Ridd.

Here is a video on YouTube of the Mark Steyn Show with Anthony Watts of website 'Watts Up With That?' and two published scientists who dismantled the 'Hockey Stick Graph', or The OneGraph as I call it, and published work Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick.

They talk about what is wrong with the climate change fiasco and at the end and in front of a large audience .. audience members state and everyone is in agreement that your more likely to get funded if you are working to promote AGW Climate Change, the whole thing is corrupted beyond belief and needs to change.

This very morning I have had to post this because Radio Host Done Smith made a remark about this after an interview with Susan Crockford, I shall link, which a biologist, who only needs six Earths (wait until the next part where I go into detail) says this is not true.

He has since been called a liar, he does lie and say stupid things despite being a Professor and lectures people, in more ways than one, and is called Chris Taylor and in Texas. I have asked if he managed to return because he dug himself out of all the snow?

Here is that Mark Steyn video and they also talk about Greta Thunberg and how she is being used by some very evil people and how it is child abuse, which gets a round of applause I might add.

The Don Smith and Susan Crockford interview and he also interviewed Tony Heller some weeks back.

This took place on the 30^th November, a Saturday, and will be posted here on this page .. eventually ..

https://donsmithshow.com/recent-shows.html

And its ludicrous that they cry 'lets work together, bring the right and the left together' which you know is coming from the left. Because they are running out of time and they know it.

These statement over something that has never been proven and in a period where it has cooled consistently for four years now?

The fact remains and I have consistently stated that not only can you not stop the rise, even if you removed all CO2 man created, but they also do not have the means to do this and do not have the first clue.

What they want is less use of fossil fuels, no use of aircraft, except foe those using private jets flying around telling us not to use aircraft. Also consistently stated that renewable energy has failed and they never think of that when they keep telling us CO2 is ever rising and higher than ever. Well no as its been higher in the past by a factor of five or more. Did you also know that when it was way higher in the distant past it was also way cooler? Yeah they do not tell you that. Easy to look up though .. image search for 'Palaeoclimatology Graph' and you will find plenty.

Wind Turbines kill millions of birds and produce little and very expensive to maintain. In Britain birdwatchers heard about the Whitethroat Needletail Swift returning to Britain and I am into Ornithology and I had never even heard of this species. First time in 15 years, apparently? Avid birdwatchers waited as it came in .. only to watch one get killed by a wind turbine.

Killing bats and insects too.

Then you have these solar panels .. whole fields of them. Yes this is the incompetence of so called 'Greens', environmentalists and leftists.

'Lets dig up and kill loads of plants, trees and animals to install solar panels to allow us to save the plants, trees and .. animals .. oh wait?!'

And these absolutely thick people actually defend this crap after years and years of nothing but failures, horror stories and rising energy prices?!

The push for electric cars is still going on. A friend of mine was in the market for a new car and he spoke to me about buying one. Previous believer in AGW and a professional himself. Told him it was a bad idea and he asked why. All I told him was this ..

'Look up the longevity of their batteries and the cost of replacing them'

He did .. looked up at me from his iPhone and said “Whaaaaaaaat?!” and this was for a cheap used hatchback. That search was well and truly over.

As a scientist and tech geek I read years ago of solar panels being created that collected four times as much energy. God knows where they are now? Heard about several batteries a very odd one using saltwater, the hydrogen battery and possibly others. God knows there they are now.

Recall mobile phones lasting a few hours in the beginning. Eventually they would last a few days, even shrinking too. Before long even early smartphones, like my old Nokia E71, would last 6 days.

Then the big screen iPhones and Android came out. Back under a day. Years and years of this and everyone thought that battery lasting a week would come back? Nope, lucky if you can get one to last two days currently.

Latest one I saw a flash of a headline of was Sold State Batteries?

The trouble with the left is .. well there is lots of trouble with the far-left and if your a believer in AGW .. and you are getting info from someone that harps on .. here is a checklist to consider ..

• They live in fantasy land
• Their information is often wrong, made up or both
• They go on emotions and ignore facts
• I get accused of being science illiterate while they know nothing of
  • Geomagnetic Fields
  • Solar Cycles
  • Sunspots
  • Seismicity
  • Volcanology
  • Layers of Atmosphere and temps
• They go on feelings
• They want to take over but have no solutions
• If you ask too many genuine questions they will
  • Get angry
  • Belittle You
  • Shame You
  • Call you names: Climate Denier, Science Denier, Pseudoscience (now this is guessing and 90% of climate models data is guess so the pseudoscience is theirs), Science Illiterate and before long .. Far-Right, Alt-Right, BOT and many others
• Try it and see what happens

Meanwhile here is a video of Jordan Peterson being asked the question above about bringing the right and left together to fight climate change. He gives a short response which has the audience roar with laughter.

But then .. he goes into specifics and more or less states many of the problems I have put out and of course the hard-left, going on emotions and not common sense, cried about this being posted and said he was not an expert and wrong.

These people's feelings run riot, they tell themselves they are right because they have a right to an opinion and somehow these non-educated lunatics think they have authority to declare that scientists are talking shite?!

These people are lunatics .. sorry but they are and they are not only highly damaging to others they have SOMEHOW .. been allowed to become strong enough in the right places to being able to threaten the economies of a long list of countries of the western world?

Why anyone would be forgiven for coming up with the idea this was all by design?

SUGGESTED SITES

• Internet
  • Watts Up With That
  • No Tricks Zone
  • Electroverse
  • GWPF
  • spaceweather.com
  • judithcurry.com
  • earth.nullschool.net
  • Principia Scientific

• YouTube
  • Tony Heller
  • GSM News (see below)
  • Adapt 2030
  • MaverickStar Reloaded
  • Oppenheimer Ranch Project
  • Ice Age Farmer

As for me? Well since I started this series and as stated I have been very busy battling on social media.

Was recently put on a short list by a very smart guy in Florida. This both humbled and shocked me as the others on the list, some I do not know, are ..

• Don Smith, radio presenter of the Don Smith Show
• Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That
• Geraint Hughes (was unfamiliar but sceptic author)
• Ned Nikolov PhD a published scientist
• Karl Zeller who worked with Nikolov and published scientist
• and ME?!

Yes that was a surprise!

EDIT:

Oops I forgot to add the video from GSM News and I also forgot Blogger now screws up the formatting and colouring and it is a nightmare to deal with. Also the colour for the theme does not appear to be in the pallette ..

I do so wish I have never heard of Google, Blogger OR YouTube as they really are run by an evil slave driving leftist CULT!!