Showing posts with label protection of animals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protection of animals. Show all posts

Monday, 30 July 2018

THE ENDANGERED

Oh dear.

Being a wildlife expert in herpetology, batrachology, ichthyology and orchidaceae I should have seen this one a mile off. That is when I came up with my catastrophe theory.

Along with money disappearing and no one knowing where it's gone out who we owe money to odd things would happen.

Building space-ports when we have no money.

Stockpiling food.

Stockpiling medicine.

Prepping the army for something.

Long term plan to store away plant food seeds then other plants.

Anyone spotted an ark yet?

The one thing I should have stated that should be looked out for is pulling money from things that would be seen as a complete waste.

So how about pulling funding for endangered animals?

It's enough to spark a petition on Change.org.

In time I'll probably think of other things they might be pulling funding from.

I can tell you one thing .. the one thing that even I and other scientists, like Thunderf00t on YouTube was worried about ..

Donald Trump was intending to pull funding on scientific research .. and then he didn't. I'd forgotten about that U-turn until I saw this again about the endangered species. He might have even increased the money into scientific research?

I must admit I'm so for saving species and I love animals and been involved with them all my life.

But I did think that it would be such a waste of something you spent a lot of time saving got wiped out in a flash over a meteor strike.

It's the same with this global warming ..

Be very, very careful putting all your eggs in one basket as you could do more harm than good.

This is not something I ever thought I would hear about happening and it kinda fits in neatly with my theory of distraction in the western world to prevent us form discovering something.

I remember a few months back a seismologist was asked on the BBC news about the increase is seismic activity. Being old he obviously did not understand the Internet fully when he said that seismic activity was not increasing it just seems like that because of social media. Yeah .. because the Internet was only invented two years ago and everyone only got into social media one year ago.

Dumb-arse answer. Should not have even bothered going on TV to come out with a lame arsed answer like that!

Saturday, 4 February 2017

OH .. MY .. DOG!

There was I lately thinking that only the loony far left were sitting themselves up to be the mindless two faced idiots that they are?

They want freedom of speech for themselves while wanting to physically attack others that say things they don't like.

They want to do away with democracy but despite this open showing of violence towards those they don't agree with are themselves willing to pay down like submissive ducklings when those that want to kill them land on their shores.

Yes plenty of people have covered that as have I and will continue to cover that.

They simply fail to see that they hurt their own cause as well as those on the left that are not complete and utter loons.

I didn't expect to stumble across another group that would sound just as loony but that those they harm are those they are tasked to protect.

Who are they supposed to protect?

The accurate wording of the question is ... What are they tasked to protect?

Confused?

Animals.

Still confused? I hope not as otherwise this may not make much sense to you and that means animals will suffer.

If you cannot work that one out then stay away from animal protection affairs! You will do more harm than good!

Actually this also seems to apply to PETA which is why I was sparked into writing this post.

PETA have contacted some gaming store, called Game Workshop, and a store I've never set foot in and told them to stop putting fur, or selling, on their figurines. Figurines from something I know if a computer game called Warhammer.

Yeeeaahh there is just a tiny-winy, incy-wincy problem with this demand. It's not fur it's plastic!
Huh? Problem solved? Just a little embarrassing but now all over? Well I can forgive you if you thought that but there is another little problem...

...PETA KNEW it was plastic!

#Facepalm

Yeeeeah apparently they want it banned because it looks like fur?!

Umm ... errrr ... they do know that the very first clothing was ALL ANIMAL SKIN, RIGHT?! So are they going to ban ALL CLOTHING next?!

#Facepalm!

Oiyamayo!!

No I need another one ...

#Facepalm!!

Banning plastic because it looks like fur! I don't fucking believe it!

It gets even better than this ... on the report page on the BBC News app there was a photo too of a bunch of semi naked or almost naked women. Each one building a banner about how they would rather go naked, well you do check my history of clothing above, than wear particular materials of clothing.

Go on, give it some thought. I think there were five of them. I reckon you will probably get one of them ... hang on let me just check ...

No, OK you would get two of them but only because I've already mentioned one. Well ... sort of mentioned one by word only. Fur.

So I reckon the other one that's obvious you would let get is of course leather.

How about the other three?

Thought of any yet?

Oh crap ...

Ah OK ...

Down. Well that would be feathers if you don't happen to know. The Quilt & Pillow Police will be knocking in 3 .. 2 ..

#Facepalm!

Wool. Yes I kid you not. Wool. The Sheep Police will be knocking very soon. Think it can't get any more ridiculous than that? You would be wrong ...

Silk. Do you know where Silk comes from? Caterpillars. Lmao.

#DoubleFacepalm!!

Well when I was a child it used to be about NOT KILLING ANIMALS.

Today it seems to be to not mildly inconvenience animals?!

Oh, oh, oh and don't forget? Each one of these women would rather go naked than wear any of those 5 things.

Jesus I need to get out down the high street more with my high powered zoom Nikon?!

Oh wait, I forgot. Exposure in a public place is illegal so they are all locked up and obviously why we have no spaces in prisons?!

Hmm what's the quickest way I can get myself locked up?! Lol.

Yup ... Sheep with cold viruses aplenty and caterpillars without warm beds? Christ, how will we stem the mass extinction?!

Lmao!

Well PETA goes on my very, very long list of public officers, public services, private companies knowingly selling you shite, ombudsman and organisations receiving donations from with naive people, tax dodgers who receive money for doing fuck all.

Just that in PETA's case they are just as obviously loony as the far left in politics.

How the FUCK have these people got jobs?!

Lmao!

Wait a minute, I just had a thought! These morons aren't the reason why there are vegetarian dog foods on the shelves that are killing dogs who don't have that long a life anyway?

If that's you PETA ... well I'd like to think of what people should use a fun for on you. It's cruelty through incompetence that's far worse than the far left.

They should change their name from PETA to FAAI, the Fight Against Animal Inconvenience! They should shut them down and put the money/donations into stopping parts of the world that are still eating Dogs and stop that.

I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it: Animal rights group PETA calls for Warhammer 'fur' ban - http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/articles/38802938

Friday, 14 November 2014

THROUGH WOODS AND CLOUDS

Always a sucker for petitions for animals, well provided they are not misguided even by scientists that get it wrong, but cruelty is cruelty.

I run this blog which is in essence a cruelty blog at the end of the day. Forget the political rubbish, political leanings of which I have none and other things it is about cruelty. Cruelty to people who are not deserving of it and as such cruelty to animals will always get a post.

If someone does anything that has a knock on effect whether intended or otherwise that had a detrimental effect be this physically, mentally or both this is cruelty. If you initially did this with a level of plausible deniability then that is dead and buried once people have pointed this out.

In fact it is this pointing out that catches out the ones that think themselves smarter than others. The punishment will be more so to, it is unavoidable. Inevitable even. That is the beauty of it if such a thing could be attributed to what I do.

Cruelty is cruelty at the end of the day and failing to deal with it and ignoring it while someone, or several even, works tirelessly to chip away and make it obvious that this has been raised directly and warning them that this is being raised publicly shows without doubt the level of contempt for any life outside their own greedy Topsy-Turvy world.

The longer this proceeds the worse it gets for those that are guilty. In the end it will occur to those that are guilty of the worse crimes, cruelty and contempt that it would become obvious when it's too late that our would have been far easier on them both punishment wise and financially had they done something sooner.

How this turns out for each is not something I design. Nor do I am for this. This blame for the ultimate conclusion must simply fall upon themselves for what had occurred. Regardless of what this amounts to.

I simply tell the stories

I simply give my opinion on news stories

I make my predictions

I provide my evidence

After this circle of events which continue on for as long as it takes the truth and the reasons for the actions, inactions and contempt become plainly obvious for all to see.

Opening their gates, mouth, in the world stage starting that they are the opposite to what I claim of also of their own doing. Being labeled or accused by reporters as liars more and more as this time goes on is an example of the self infliction that will inevitably come over the next 18 months.

I cannot emphasise things enough on so many occasions throughout the life of this blog. Sometimes I get tired of this.

At the end of the day out all rather depends on whether or not a large enough section of the public are humane and not immoral. Not those that like to condemn things after the event because they have a camera rolling nearby or a microphone in their faces.

At the end of the day it all comes down to actions and not words. I know that at some point I will be contested regarding this. Likely a very big name will ask or want to talk about how they got involved in the areas I covered and how slowly the public became involved compared to someone offering free pornography or half price iPhones or iPads!

Those that think that people on benefits for into the category of a section of society that bright the country down. To which I would urge they do the maths and have a constructive argument. Well if they did the math they would realise there is no argument.

I bought the new Pink Floyd album called The Endless River. I thought it would be crap and it's the best album since 79's The Wall. Over ninety percent think the same but on Amazon there were some peculiar reviews. People really panned the album without reason. I wrote a glowing review and stated I don't understand the tiny minority that hate it. One guy said I was ... pretentious?! His review just literally said ...

It's crap, don't bother and buy The Division Bell.

It should have been left on the cutting room floor.

That was the base if their arguments. I had no idea what they expected from it from geniuses in their seventies?!

I never thought it would be as good as The Division Bell let alone be far better.

Best left on the cutting room floor!

Was another remark. Despite all the rest of the crap that gets released? They are not alone in doing this and Radiohead have done this and starred they are doing this right now!

They completely mid the point that they are giving a review to inform others. Completely missed the point that they look utterly stupid for buying an album without hearing it first. Despite being a huge Pink Floyd fan for thirty five years and at Earls Court in 1994 I did indeed listen to it first.

They then complained they were no lyrics?! What the feck? Have they even listened to stuff like Echoes? Or Shine On You Crazy Diamond?

Mike Oldfield had no problem with this not did Moby or Jean Michel Jarre.

I got into an argument that for into name calling because I pointed out their mistakes, though to be fair one commenter stated I did make valid points in the parts that were ineligible no thanks to Google's Android OS that had been turned into utter junk for the last half dozen versions they don't seem to care about.

I have no problem stripping flesh from big names. I did think I would say that about Pink Floyd. Instead they got praise. A lot of praise and not that they needed it as the four big stores of WH Smith, Tesco, Sainsburys and Morrison's were all sold out in a 24 got period.

That latter point is something else missed by those that did not like it.

In fact they missed the point that I was telling them they missed something and was... educating them. Idea being that they would listen again and realise they were missing out on so much and actually enjoy it so did not waste their money?

But no.

Therefore I use the phrase 'You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink' a lot throughout this blog. That incident on Amazon is exactly why I do and why I knew when I started all of this that it would take a long time of banging heads against the proverbial wall.

I also get moaned about because of my level of intelligence in my personal life. I'm used to it and it has gone on for years and fun is made of me behind my back, even about this blog. Yet these people that are less intelligent than I, which is why they make fun, do not get this from me. I don't make fun of people being naive and stupid. I could. I could ream of jokes and funny comments to get laughs on here but that ignore the point and I won't stoop to low levels many others have no problem in exploring.

What did that say about people?

Many, many years ago we had a friend come to work with me and my father. We were involved with animals and are experts in many fields to do with them. We were wholesalers supplying pet stores.
Working in a cellar with several drivers we heard someone shout out "How much oxygen so these Rats need?!" Several people turned around to see this guy holding an oxygen gun into a plastic bag used for fish. The Rats were food for snakes. They were frozen. Stunned, confused silence filled the cellar before I broke it with "None. They are dead, mate!" to which laughter then broke out.
I am sure he made the mistake or if first day nerves and realise later.

My point is he became a friend I had for many years. He always and for help and advice and would do anything for me. My Dad liked him too but he turned to me when I was about to visit him one night and asked why I was mates with him because we were on far different levels of intelligence. I said it is because he was a nice guy and has a heart. Plus he was damn funny. That was long before I attended college to get into university to get my degree.

Now I hope that like anecdote teaches one again not to his things against others unless they are fully deserving of it?!

So to bring attention to the fact that 'they' seen to be wriggling out of prosecuting some of these people here is the link to the petition.