THE TWATTER TWUTHS

Ooh dear .. this is not going to end well.

Twatter just blocked a guy with a warning .. in the warning it states you get blocked and gives the reasons you get blocked.

So reasonable to assume he broke one of the rules they stated in the message?

Wrong!!

He didn't break any of the rules and it gets better as ..

He told the truth in his opinion and I have nothing that doubts this ..

He responded to someone else, a young black guy, stating that the Police, in America, are responsible for the deaths of many black people.

This other guy stated that black guys between 18 and 30 are responsible for 90% of black people's deaths.

I don't know if that's true .. he says it is and told rid young black guy to do his research.

Ahh so reasonable to assume that the Twatter Twits saw it, it was likely reported by the young moron, thought it was racist and blocked him?!

Yeeeah .. about that? Maybe they should have checked his profile first?

The guy with three statistics was none other than popular YouTuber David Harris Jnr!

Ooh yeah .. he's black!

Ooh dear. Well he has already done a YouTube video about this and you can find that below.

Now I wonder if the Twatter Twits will do an about face on this? Too late now.

Or is it a case that the left are losing the ability to use their favourite buzzwords? This can be their own like racist, misogynist, patriarchy, Nazis and alt-right fit anything not extreme left. Or ride they like to steal from anyone not far left, like 'fake news' and 'snowflakes'?

They tried to state that white men are evil and should all die as they are privileged .. fuck .. off. Now they are moving onto white women, guess they didn't see that one coming?

They try to lie about figures ..

Yeah second UK referendum because more prior want to stay .. yeah one or two that regretted it does not equate to one or two million. They also fail to realise that although some of them are rejecting democracy because it didn't work in their favour .. many remainers respect we have a democratic society and don't want a totalitarian state. Morons.

I imagine that as they are now realising that #metoo has spawned #walkaway and also #mgtow is a growing thing and many of those they thought they had in the corner are not .. they must be getting more than a little nervous right now?!

Ooh how I hope I watch this one unfold.

NOT ENOUGH STRAWS

Been a bit out of some of the YouTube disagreements for some months now, thanks to some public services that are anything but that.

But this morning I came across a video by Sargon of Akkad with a rather odd title I was not familiar with. 'A Study in the Dunning Karger Effect'. I had to look it up!

Of course as I suspected it would be based in psychology and the effect itself I am familiar with, though not to the extent of someone convinced that covering their face with lemon juice would prevent them from being identified by security cameras. You will find that story on the Wikipedia page but ... just be careful about believing everything you read on Wikipedia.

Sargon's video was in response to a video made slamming him by one of his notorious enemies, Kevin Logan. In all honesty I was surprised that Mr Logan was still doing this and I had thought that he had slowly vanished into obscurity. Or left YouTube altogether.

It was about this old, and to be honest fecking boring, 'patriarchy' argument to do with extreme feminists.

The groups of people that think that they can just force evolution over night because they want it ... no they demand it and of course ... reasons. Stupid and wrong reasons that are just known and referred to by many as just 'reasons'.

Oh boy.

Not everything is equal, that is just the way it is, and with some things they can never be equal .. well not naturally at any rate.

So what did Mr Logan do this time to prove his point and prove himself correct?

It is hilarious how people that are in the wrong but so desperate to prove themselves correct will resort to name calling and insults. Once that starts you really have lost, even if many of your followers and believers are too blind to see this. More competent and intelligent people will. In fact this demonstrates said effect previously mentioned.

The other is that he ran through history to pull up some examples of women being the main or equal presence in various wars and battles.

Now let us leave aside that his 'history' seem to span 400 years, which may seem like a lot to Mr Logan but is in fact nothing compared to tens of thousands of years. I am not even going to include the even longer period of time since humans existed.

The Joan of Arc mention was ... well stupid. One woman that led an army and yet the way Mr Logan talked about it you would think she led an army full of women. Yeah that's right, Mr Logan, give children the wrong impression about history to help them with their history lessons. As long as you appear to be correct by the end of it, eh?

But I was at the half way point when I suddenly realised something.

Mr Logan also gave the impression that he is intelligent and is highly knowledgeable in history when in fact his whole intended impression of that falls down as soon as you realise something...

Exactly how long as this argument with Sargon over patriarchy?  A year? Two years? Longer? I cannot even be bothered to look but it has been a bloody long time as arguments go.

Mr Logan why have you waited until now to bring up all these history lessons?

I will tell you why because you only recently came up with the idea to Google history to come up with a list of things you previously did not know about ... umm Joan of Arc? LMAO.

Sorry I got sidetracked there a little bit when I laughed at how he had to look up Joan of Arc to come up with this latest argument. You looked up Joan of Arc? Really?!

Anyway the point is that if an argument goes on for a very long time ... I would strongly suggest you resist diving into history to prove your points and especially so when your trying to give the impression that you knew about all this.

Maybe it is because his imaginary girlfriend got caught out as a liar and a cheater, one that he defended so doggedly it was obvious to all but the most naive what was going on here, that I just assumed he had gradually faded into the background? I do not know.

I am amazed that he is still around.

Maybe he still lives in hope that he will still get an invite or a knock on his front door one of these days? From the infamous Jenny McDermott? Once again, who knows?

If you want to make more things equal then make damn sure that is what your asking for because you if you Social Justice Warriors only want to pick and choose what you want to be equal .. then your not actually asking for equality.

You want the best jobs? Then you have to show you can take the worst jobs too.

You want to be paid the same in sports? Then two things are needed ... you either put in the same amount of effort, so Tennis players play the same amount of games across gendres, or you attract the same amount of spectators, as in football.

You cannot be paid when you are not getting the money to do it, in football at any rate, and you cannot demand the best jobs and shirk the shitty and messy jobs.

Then there are the thought processes of these thought police.

Sorry but you want to change the basic psychological make up that has been evolving for millions of years.

God, when I think about life and how short it is I really do feel sorry for these people when I stop and think about it and how they spend their entire lives chasing ghosts.

I wonder if they will get to their fifties and stop and think 'Shit! What did I do with my life?!'

Such a shame.

Waste of time to when we could be conversing about things that we can change or can achieve.

THE RINGING OF BELLS

I actually watched another David Seaman video on YouTube and for a bit he was talking about claims made about him by commenters about being wrong or being a shill and wondered if he was talking about me?

I had to try and remember if I had said anything that might have suggested he was a shill, or a government misinformation type of employee as, after all, these do exist and even David Seaman himself has touched upon this.

After watching more of the video I decided he was not talking about me. Phew.

I only ever state that people should be careful of who they believe, of the misinformation out there and that though there are crazy conspiracy theorists does not mean that everything that sounds a little far fetched to absolutely crazy sounding is false.

I have wondered long and hard for the longest time on how to get that point across … I think I finally found it …

The crazy in conspiracies comes from crazy sounding theories that are manufactured out of paranoia which means it is the person that manufactures this as crazy. NOT THE THEORY! Just the person that thinks up these crazy things.

In another way I could put it reading about something crazy sounding and wondering if it is true does not make you crazy or a crazy conspiracy theorist.

So there.

I have likely published a video or two by The Next News Network and even though I have done this I see the titles in videos suggested to me by these people and go "Really?!" They do often sound like overly paranoid people and I ask myself how they can be so popular when many things I see stated are not likely to come to pass or the time went by and they did not.

Also I forgot in my PizzaGate pieces the mention of another fact in the emails along with the sacrifice to Moloch is also the spirit cooking mention in an email to Tony Podesta. I was reminded by watching a video of, I believe, Reality Calls though this was published b someone else … again, I think. Link below.

These things could themselves, of course, be codes for something else entirely though if the are they were completely moronic choices and prove that these people should not be involved in governing any country.

What struck me with David Seaman's video is him referring himself as actually being left and not far right or alt-right, as the fashion in mainstream media is to list everything they do not like the sound of as being alt-right.

I also found it interesting that he separated the alt-right group from the far right groups like the Tea Party, which I honesty know very little about.

Does this mean that the mainstream media are trying to show that everything on the right side of politics as mad, insane, racist and misogynist by working on one section at a time? The far right long since been labelled this and now they move into the the next section? Worrying.

Almost bizarrely I seem to recall him stating, and am running the video as I type this, that he questions why you have to believe in 'A, B, C' to belong to the left or the right? This is exactly what I have been stating for over four years on my blogs and what I have been telling friends and family for the last 15 years plus.

Coffee Party! I called it, I want a dollar for every time someone says it!!

Sorry, I was just thinking there for a moment, the far right in America is known as the Tea Party and given its own labels as being mad and over the top so why not the far left? As I was thinking that I realised the name 'Coffee Party' would be appropriate? Lol!

But why is that? Why has the far left not got its own label to lump everyone in? Well arguably you could say you do but it is more an individual thing when you state 'Social Justice Warrior' and even the term used plurally is still referring to them all individually.

Maybe the are so bonkers they can not collectively form any sort of group? Or maybe that there are so many opportunists on this trying to perch their arses at the top of the tree to become the official spokesperson with the true aim of making money that its simply a mess?

Well I can name Laci Green, Anita Sarkeesian and now Zarna Joshi. God only knows how many others there are out their … along with those pursuing positions of Generals of each of those three.

Ohh what? You did not think anyone could see through the charades? God, give me strength these people are truly self-obsessed and deluded. Pull the other one it has bells on!

Along with me you have a whole host of intelligent YouTubers that not only see everyone for what they are but all them out on it. Sargon of Akkad, Thunderfoot, Noel Plum, CharmingMan, Woz Lee, Agent of Doubt … oh How could I forget Bearing, The WoolyBumbleBee and many others whose names I cannot recall and others I have yet to discover.

Also the other good thing about sticking to the truth and facts is that when accusers or those insinuated against react it is easier to see any guilt hidden away in their reactions.

I shall explain ..

All of those above have my respect because they doggedly stick to the facts and are only interested in the facts. NOW if suddenly they were all removed are all had videos of a particular subject matter removed this would send out a large message. Or at least it would to me. That someone powerful, somewhere is trying to hide something because they are all onto something.

The problem is they have to cover the subjects, or at least they all have to cover a subject or enough of them for it to be very noticeable.

The problem arises when anyone becomes scared of dealing or talking about particular subjects and I suppose PizzaGate is a prime example. I have known of only two, one in the above list, Sargon of Akkad, and one not, MundaneMatt and sorry I did not remember you a few seconds ago, lol. Sargon did an excellent video on the subject whereas MundaneMatt slipped a little, laughed at anyone speaking about it and insulted many concerned people, be they crazy or not.

However and for me it is these, kind of, fringe subjects that makes people stand out when they all do that which the above do. For me crazy does not equate to false and the ultimate aim in each subject is to get to the truth. Not merely wanting something to be the truth to make someone look correct or smart to acquire fringe benefits. Something of a widespread disease if I am honest.

If I get it wrong then I get it wrong. That's it and that's all, but others do not take this approach and get offended or angry about it. I actually see this in people who have very long track records of getting things wrong 80 to 90 percent of the time! I kid you not.

Why people simply do not accept it as a learning process and move on I do not know? Taking this approach and you will soon realise that the frequency of which you get it wrong decreases. I know this because a very long time ago this was the stance I took … along with many other stances and I am not speaking of Wing Chun Kung Fu here either. Though I know and have taken that stance many times over the years, lol.

Of course there is the aspect that if bloggers, YouTubers and commenters keep insisting on the crazy shit or coming up with their own far fetched ideas and insisting these are in fact … umm facts then you are not helping to expose anyone but in deed quite the opposite in helping them find a way to over up their nefarious and evil acts.

You might seriously want to think long and hard about that last paragraph.

Then once you collectively only deal with the facts known and ask the right questions any removal will be seen as an attempt to hide something and therefore an admission of guilt and any 'shills' ou there, a term many love to use repeatedly, they will become most obvious. Negating the need or Anonymous … or the REAL Anonymous to do any hacking to expose anything.

That is the sad state of things today and in recent times is that we have had to rely on an organisation called Anonymous to get to the truth on some things Wikileaks too, if it has not been taken over by some government organisation or other?

Except if you look around you will find dozens, I am not even joking and I know to be true in the USA, of organisations that are meant to deal with laws, criminals and nefarious and evil acts. Except despite all that we have had Anonymous and Wikileaks pop up and I have no doubt that five years from now there will be one to several more.

Oh and I do not mean copycat organisations pretending to be Anonymous or Wikileaks which are easy to detect by the use of the name with some slant on it. This is especially true of Anonymous who have even done videos mentioning of other posters on the Internet pretending to be them. But then when your a hidden organisation like Anonymous you can hardly come out publicly and shout from the rooftops “We ARE the REAL Anonymous!” as they would all be locked up within hours. I don't know what is going on here, maybe they are just after hits and views, these people are it is surprisingly hard to make any money out of Google and advertising, or are actually trying to make Anonymous come out and shout “I AM SPARTACUS!” so they can arrest them?

You see? You have to be so careful and the nefarious ones know that you will come out and 'chat utter shite' on the Interpratt and therefore help them remain hidden. Don't give me the 'shills' argument either as I have already explained these dicks would be easy for more people to spot if you stick to what is know for sure and ask the right questions.

So are we there yet?

Stick to the known facts and ask the RIGHT questions!

Allnights, out!

David Seaman on why 'A, B, C' has to mean right or left in politics ...

And who I believe to be Reality Calls talking about Moloch and Spirit Cooking, meaning eating human flesh, in the Wikileaks emails ...